Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3141 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 5, 2011      TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3141 by Hartnett (Relating to the registration and protection of trademarks.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would make several changes to Chapter 16 of the Business and Commerce Code on trademarks.   The bill would make a mark registrable except for under certain circumstances to include if the mark resembles a mark registered in this state or an unabandoned mark registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.   The certificate of registration issued by the Secretary of State (SOS) would be required to contain certain items to include the Secretary of States signature, the SOS official seal, and a reproduction of the mark.   The registration of a mark would expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of registration.   The bill would allow a license, security interest, or mortgage that relates to a mark registered or an application pending to be recorded with SOS.   SOS would be allowed by rule to prescribe the amount of fees payable for the various applications and for the filing and recording of those applications for related services.   SOS would no longer have to notify registrants in writing of the necessity for renewing or reregistering.   A suit, proceeding, or appeal pending on September 1, 2011 would be governed by the law in effect on the date the suit, proceeding, or appeal was filed.   It is anticipated that any costs associated with implementation of the legislation could be absorbed within existing resources.   The bill would take effect on September 1, 2011. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:307 Secretary of State   LBB Staff:  JOB, AG, MS, BTA    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 5, 2011





  TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3141 by Hartnett (Relating to the registration and protection of trademarks.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3141 by Hartnett (Relating to the registration and protection of trademarks.), As Engrossed

 Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce 

 Honorable John Carona, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3141 by Hartnett (Relating to the registration and protection of trademarks.), As Engrossed

HB3141 by Hartnett (Relating to the registration and protection of trademarks.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would make several changes to Chapter 16 of the Business and Commerce Code on trademarks.   The bill would make a mark registrable except for under certain circumstances to include if the mark resembles a mark registered in this state or an unabandoned mark registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.   The certificate of registration issued by the Secretary of State (SOS) would be required to contain certain items to include the Secretary of States signature, the SOS official seal, and a reproduction of the mark.   The registration of a mark would expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of registration.   The bill would allow a license, security interest, or mortgage that relates to a mark registered or an application pending to be recorded with SOS.   SOS would be allowed by rule to prescribe the amount of fees payable for the various applications and for the filing and recording of those applications for related services.   SOS would no longer have to notify registrants in writing of the necessity for renewing or reregistering.   A suit, proceeding, or appeal pending on September 1, 2011 would be governed by the law in effect on the date the suit, proceeding, or appeal was filed.   It is anticipated that any costs associated with implementation of the legislation could be absorbed within existing resources.   The bill would take effect on September 1, 2011.

The bill would make several changes to Chapter 16 of the Business and Commerce Code on trademarks.

 

The bill would make a mark registrable except for under certain circumstances to include if the mark resembles a mark registered in this state or an unabandoned mark registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

 

The certificate of registration issued by the Secretary of State (SOS) would be required to contain certain items to include the Secretary of States signature, the SOS official seal, and a reproduction of the mark.

 

The registration of a mark would expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of registration.

 

The bill would allow a license, security interest, or mortgage that relates to a mark registered or an application pending to be recorded with SOS.

 

SOS would be allowed by rule to prescribe the amount of fees payable for the various applications and for the filing and recording of those applications for related services.

 

SOS would no longer have to notify registrants in writing of the necessity for renewing or reregistering.

 

A suit, proceeding, or appeal pending on September 1, 2011 would be governed by the law in effect on the date the suit, proceeding, or appeal was filed.

 

It is anticipated that any costs associated with implementation of the legislation could be absorbed within existing resources.

 

The bill would take effect on September 1, 2011.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 307 Secretary of State

307 Secretary of State

LBB Staff: JOB, AG, MS, BTA

 JOB, AG, MS, BTA