Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB3194 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 3, 2011      TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3194 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Water Code to require a groundwater and conservation district to renew a permit at the end of the permit term without a hearing, and to consider an application to amend a permit if the permit has not changed the point of withdrawal, place or purpose of use, or permitted rate and amount of groundwater withdrawal. The bill also would authorize a district to amend an operating permit to adjust the amount or rate of authorized withdrawals by not more than five percent, based on a finding and supported by evidence submitted to the general manager of the district. Local Government Impact There could be fiscal impact to a district, but the amounts would vary depending on current procedures and a district's budget.According to information provided by several districts, if a district were required to hold a public hearing, the cost could be more than $12,000 per hearing which would be a significant portion of the current budgets ($25,000 to $100,000). In addition, while the five percent change to a permit would not result in increased costs, it could dramatically affect the amount of water that would be available.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, SZ, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 3, 2011





  TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3194 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3194 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced

 Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources 

 Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Natural Resources 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3194 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced

HB3194 by Martinez Fischer (Relating to the renewal or amendment of permits issued by groundwater conservation districts.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Water Code to require a groundwater and conservation district to renew a permit at the end of the permit term without a hearing, and to consider an application to amend a permit if the permit has not changed the point of withdrawal, place or purpose of use, or permitted rate and amount of groundwater withdrawal. The bill also would authorize a district to amend an operating permit to adjust the amount or rate of authorized withdrawals by not more than five percent, based on a finding and supported by evidence submitted to the general manager of the district.

Local Government Impact

There could be fiscal impact to a district, but the amounts would vary depending on current procedures and a district's budget.According to information provided by several districts, if a district were required to hold a public hearing, the cost could be more than $12,000 per hearing which would be a significant portion of the current budgets ($25,000 to $100,000). In addition, while the five percent change to a permit would not result in increased costs, it could dramatically affect the amount of water that would be available.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, SZ, TP

 JOB, SZ, TP