Texas House Bill HB3214

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/10/11
• Refer: 3/18/11

Caption

Relating to providing notice to certain state agencies of a criminal investigation relating to an election.

Impact

The enactment of HB 3214 would result in direct updates to the Election Code, specifically Sections 273.001(e) and (f), thereby formalizing the process of notification regarding election-related criminal investigations. This change could potentially allow for quicker responses from state authorities and greater oversight of local election integrity efforts. By establishing a clear line of communication, the bill seeks to improve the state's ability to address and resolve issues that arise during elections, thereby reinforcing public confidence in the electoral process.

Summary

House Bill 3214 aims to enhance the transparency and communication between district attorneys and state agencies in the event of a criminal investigation related to elections. The bill mandates that once an investigation begins, the county or district attorney must notify both the secretary of state and the attorney general within 30 days, providing details on the election in question. This notification must also occur when the investigation concludes, including whether any indictments have been filed. These provisions are intended to ensure that state officials are promptly informed of any electoral malfeasance and can act accordingly.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 3214 appears to be supportive among proponents of election integrity and transparency. Supporters argue that the bill fosters accountability and is a necessary step in ensuring that any misconduct is addressed in a timely manner. However, the bill might encounter resistance from those who view such measures as governmental overreach or unnecessary bureaucracy that could complicate local jurisdictions' handling of election matters.

Contention

One point of contention may arise around the balance of power between local authorities handling elections and state agencies overseeing these processes. Critics might argue that while improved communication is essential, the bill could lead to oversteps by the state into local election management, undermining local autonomy. Furthermore, there may be concerns about the implications for voter privacy and the details disclosed during criminal investigations, potentially affecting public perception and trust in elections.