LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 12, 2011 TO: Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3219 by Thompson (Relating to intelligence data standards and protected personal information.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3219, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($1,427,992) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 12, 2011
TO: Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3219 by Thompson (Relating to intelligence data standards and protected personal information.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3219 by Thompson (Relating to intelligence data standards and protected personal information.), As Introduced
Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety
Honorable Sid Miller, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3219 by Thompson (Relating to intelligence data standards and protected personal information.), As Introduced
HB3219 by Thompson (Relating to intelligence data standards and protected personal information.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3219, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($1,427,992) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3219, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($1,427,992) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2012 ($751,950) 2013 ($676,042) 2014 ($676,042) 2015 ($676,042) 2016 ($676,042)
2012 ($751,950)
2013 ($676,042)
2014 ($676,042)
2015 ($676,042)
2016 ($676,042)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2011 2012 ($751,950) 6.0 2013 ($676,042) 6.0 2014 ($676,042) 6.0 2015 ($676,042) 6.0 2016 ($676,042) 6.0
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2011 2012 ($751,950) 6.0 2013 ($676,042) 6.0 2014 ($676,042) 6.0 2015 ($676,042) 6.0 2016 ($676,042) 6.0
2012 ($751,950) 6.0
2013 ($676,042) 6.0
2014 ($676,042) 6.0
2015 ($676,042) 6.0
2016 ($676,042) 6.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Government Code to provide guidelines for the collection, storage, and dissemination of intelligence data by law enforcement or criminal justice agencies and criminal intelligence systems, as defined by the bill. The bill would require the Office of Attorney General (OAG) to provide oversight of the intelligence data and privacy protection functions of criminal intelligence systems in the state. The bill would take effect immediately upon a two-thirds vote of all the members in each house. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
The bill would amend the Government Code to provide guidelines for the collection, storage, and dissemination of intelligence data by law enforcement or criminal justice agencies and criminal intelligence systems, as defined by the bill. The bill would require the Office of Attorney General (OAG) to provide oversight of the intelligence data and privacy protection functions of criminal intelligence systems in the state. The bill would take effect immediately upon a two-thirds vote of all the members in each house. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
Methodology
The Office of the Attorney General indicates that it would require 6 additional staff to implement provisions of the bill totaling $443,501 out of General Revenue each fiscal year for salaries. Benefit costs associated with those additional FTEs would total $123,559 each fiscal year out of General Revenue. In addition, the agency indicates that it would require $100,000 in fiscal year 2012 and $65,000 each remaining fiscal year out of General Revenue for technology related equipment and software. Operating expenses would total $66,690 in fiscal year 2012 and $25,782 each remaining fiscal year out of General Revenue. Travel expenses would total $18,200 each fiscal year out of General Revenue. The Department of Public Safety (DPS) indicates the bills definition of criminal intelligence system could include any dataset and accompanying equipment and facilities maintained by DPS, including criminal history information, emergency management, drivers license, private security, crime lab, and criminal and traffic enforcement datasets. To ensure compliance with the bills requirements, DPS would have to review the policies and procedures of every dataset. Additionally, DPS indicates the bills restrictions regarding the maintenance of certain noncriminal information would inhibit the functions and purpose of several areas of DPS including drivers license, private security, concealed handgun registration, controlled substance registration, and commercial vehicle enforcement. Due to the issues listed above, DPS indicates the level and scope of the costs associated with the bills provisions cannot be determined.
The Office of the Attorney General indicates that it would require 6 additional staff to implement provisions of the bill totaling $443,501 out of General Revenue each fiscal year for salaries. Benefit costs associated with those additional FTEs would total $123,559 each fiscal year out of General Revenue. In addition, the agency indicates that it would require $100,000 in fiscal year 2012 and $65,000 each remaining fiscal year out of General Revenue for technology related equipment and software. Operating expenses would total $66,690 in fiscal year 2012 and $25,782 each remaining fiscal year out of General Revenue. Travel expenses would total $18,200 each fiscal year out of General Revenue.
The Department of Public Safety (DPS) indicates the bills definition of criminal intelligence system could include any dataset and accompanying equipment and facilities maintained by DPS, including criminal history information, emergency management, drivers license, private security, crime lab, and criminal and traffic enforcement datasets. To ensure compliance with the bills requirements, DPS would have to review the policies and procedures of every dataset. Additionally, DPS indicates the bills restrictions regarding the maintenance of certain noncriminal information would inhibit the functions and purpose of several areas of DPS including drivers license, private security, concealed handgun registration, controlled substance registration, and commercial vehicle enforcement. Due to the issues listed above, DPS indicates the level and scope of the costs associated with the bills provisions cannot be determined.
Technology
The OAG indicates that it would require $100,000 in fiscal year 2012 and $65,000 each remaining fiscal year out of General Revenue for technology related equipment and software.
Local Government Impact
The bill would provide guidelines for local law enforcements collection of and access to personal information when utilizing criminal intelligence systems. This could lead to some costs and additional administrative burden. Costs would depend on specific policies adopted by law enforcement, as well as the policies a local law enforcement agency currently has in place; however fiscal impact on local governments is not anticipated to be significant.
Source Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General, 405 Department of Public Safety
302 Office of the Attorney General, 405 Department of Public Safety
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG, JM, KKR
JOB, ESi, GG, JM, KKR