Texas House Bill HB3228

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/10/11
• Refer: 3/18/11

Caption

Relating to the creation of DNA records for the state and federal DNA database systems.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would significantly alter the procedures relating to DNA evidence in Texas. It mandates law enforcement agencies to inform testing laboratories of a suspect's status after a two-year period and requires the expungement of DNA records for individuals no longer considered suspects. This ensures that the state maintains accurate records and does not unduly hold onto DNA information that is no longer relevant, promoting fair treatment of individuals who may have been wrongfully accused.

Summary

House Bill 3228 proposes the introduction of regulations concerning the creation of DNA records for individuals suspected of criminal offenses. The bill amends the Government Code, specifically adding provisions that allow biological specimens from suspects to be analyzed for forensic identification profiles, including DNA profiles. This provision is directed at enhancing law enforcement's capabilities in criminal investigations by providing access to forensic data that could lead to criminal apprehensions.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB3228 appears to support the balance between effective law enforcement and individual rights. Proponents advocate for the streamline of DNA investigations, citing the benefits of having accurate and accessible forensic data for resolving criminal cases. However, there may also be concerns raised about privacy and the handling of sensitive biological information, especially regarding the processes of record handling and expungement.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the specifics of how DNA samples are handled and the implications of the expungement process. Critics might argue that while the intent is to protect individuals’ rights, the execution of such policies may lack sufficient oversight, leading to potential violations of privacy. Furthermore, the effectiveness of these amendments in improving justice outcomes remains to be fully assessed, with ongoing debates likely around the balance of public safety and personal privacy.