Texas House Bill HB3289

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Refer: 3/18/11

Caption

Relating to expenditure of certain wine related revenue

Impact

The proposed changes are expected to have a significant impact on state laws regarding the distribution of revenue generated from the wine industry. By amending Section 205.03, the bill outlines various allocations such as funding for extension viticulture operations, research at the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, and support for institutions of higher education to establish faculty positions in enology. These measures could enhance the growth of the wine industry, support agricultural education, and increase the economic impact of wine production in Texas.

Summary

House Bill 3289 addresses the expenditure of certain wine-related revenues in Texas. Specifically, it modifies the Alcoholic Beverage Code to allow for the appropriation of revenues derived from excise taxes on wine and sales taxes collected from out-of-state wineries. The bill establishes different financial thresholds and specific allocations of these revenues for various educational and research purposes related to viticulture and enology. This funding aims to strengthen the wine industry in Texas by promoting research, education, and development in related fields.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for the agricultural sector and the wine industry. Proponents argue that it represents a necessary investment in the future of viticulture and enology in Texas, emphasizing the need for enhanced educational programs and research initiatives. However, there may be concerns regarding the specific allocation of funds and whether it adequately addresses the various needs within the wine industry.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from how effectively the bill balances the distribution of funds across different programs and institutions. The possibility of limited funding based on generated revenues raises questions about the long-term sustainability of viticulture programs. Critics may argue that prioritizing funding for certain educational initiatives over others could lead to disparities in support for different regions or types of research within the wine industry.