LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 18, 2011 TO: Honorable Richard Pena Raymond, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3342 by Naishtat (Relating to representation of and by the state and joinder of the state in certain mental health proceedings.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill clarifies that the state shall be made party in a habeas corpus proceeding in which an inpatient mental health facility or physician is a party as a result of enforcing a commitment order. According to the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) this provision reflects current practice and therefore should not result in any additional cost to the State. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:537 State Health Services, Department of LBB Staff: JOB, CL, MB, JF, NB, KKR
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 18, 2011
TO: Honorable Richard Pena Raymond, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3342 by Naishtat (Relating to representation of and by the state and joinder of the state in certain mental health proceedings.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Richard Pena Raymond, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3342 by Naishtat (Relating to representation of and by the state and joinder of the state in certain mental health proceedings.), As Introduced
Honorable Richard Pena Raymond, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
Honorable Richard Pena Raymond, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3342 by Naishtat (Relating to representation of and by the state and joinder of the state in certain mental health proceedings.), As Introduced
HB3342 by Naishtat (Relating to representation of and by the state and joinder of the state in certain mental health proceedings.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill clarifies that the state shall be made party in a habeas corpus proceeding in which an inpatient mental health facility or physician is a party as a result of enforcing a commitment order. According to the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) this provision reflects current practice and therefore should not result in any additional cost to the State.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 537 State Health Services, Department of
537 State Health Services, Department of
LBB Staff: JOB, CL, MB, JF, NB, KKR
JOB, CL, MB, JF, NB, KKR