Texas House Bill HB3379

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Refer: 3/18/11

Caption

Relating to the appointment of members of the Correctional Managed Health Care Committee, and the authority of the Correctional Managed Health Care Committee to direct the allocation of legislative appropriations for the purpose of providing health care to the persons confined by the department.

Impact

The proposed changes may significantly affect how health care is administered within Texas prisons and jails. By allowing for more public members and establishing direct contracts with educational institutions like The University of Texas Medical Branch, the bill positions the committee to facilitate a more integrated approach to managed health care. Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity for transparency and accountability regarding the expenditure of legislative appropriations related to inmate health care, an area that has seen scrutiny in the past.

Summary

House Bill 3379 seeks to amend the Texas Government Code, specifically to overhaul the composition and authority of the Correctional Managed Health Care Committee. This bill increases the number of public members from three to six, with provisions ensuring that at least three of these members are licensed medical practitioners. The primary intent is to enhance the governance of health care services provided to individuals confined within the state's correctional facilities, thus aiming for better oversight and quality of care.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB3379 appears to be positive, with stakeholders likely viewing it as an important step towards reforming health care within the correctional system. Supporters advocate for increased medical expertise in the decision-making process through more qualified committee members. However, concerns could arise regarding the implementation and funding of the proposed changes, especially from groups worried about potential budget constraints impacting health care delivery.

Contention

While the overarching goals of HB3379 are to improve health care access and quality for confined individuals, there may be contentious points regarding the allocation of funds and resources. Some lawmakers may express concern about expanding committee authority without sufficient checks and balances or worry that additional oversight could complicate bureaucratic processes. The balance between cost management and high-quality care is expected to be a focal point of debate as the bill moves forward.