Texas House Bill HB3412

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Refer: 3/18/11

Caption

Relating to regulation of the management and disposal of certain drinking water treatment residuals through underground injection.

Impact

The adjustments made by HB3412 are intended to positively impact state laws concerning the management of drinking water residuals. By facilitating a more straightforward pathway for obtaining necessary permits, the bill is expected to enhance administrative efficiencies while ensuring compliance with public health and safety standards. This legislative move is particularly pertinent given rising concerns regarding groundwater quality and the management of substances that could potentially harm drinking water supplies.

Summary

House Bill 3412 aims to regulate the management and disposal of drinking water treatment residuals through underground injection. The bill amends the Health and Safety Code and the Water Code to expedite the permitting process for treatment residuals when disposing of these materials into bedded salt formations. The intention is to streamline the regulatory requirements associated with managing water treatment by eliminating redundant processes and enhancing efficiencies for applicants seeking permits or licenses from the state-wide oversight agencies.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB3412 appears to be supportive among stakeholders focused on improving the water management framework in Texas. Proponents of the bill argue it is a progressive step towards reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies that could impede timely water management practices. However, there may be contrasting sentiments regarding the environmental implications of increased disposal of treatment residuals and the necessity of maintaining stringent oversight to protect public health.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the environmental ramifications of enhanced disposal measures allowed under HB3412. Critics may voice concerns about the safeguards in place to guarantee that groundwater quality remains protected and whether expedited processes could overlook potential risks. Discussions may revolve around the balance between advancing administrative convenience and ensuring comprehensive environmental protections are upheld.