Texas House Bill HB3578

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/20/11
• Voted on by House: 5/13/11
• Refer: 3/23/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/19/11
• Report Pass: 4/19/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Engrossed: 5/13/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/13/11
• Report Pass: 5/19/11
• Enrolled: 5/25/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to clarification of the authorized uses for loans under public institution of higher education emergency loan programs.

Impact

The bill mandates that the loans must be repaid within 90 days for regular semesters, with terms for shorter summer sessions based on duration. Additionally, the legislation caps the interest rate on loans at a maximum of five percent per year or allows for an origination fee not exceeding 1.25 percent of the loan amount. This provision is aimed at providing financial relief to students who face unexpected educational costs while ensuring that the loans remain manageable in terms of repayment.

Summary

House Bill 3578 introduces clarifications regarding the authorized uses for loans provided under public institution of higher education emergency loan programs in Texas. The bill seeks to standardize the policies surrounding these loans by specifying the repayment terms and the allowable costs for which these loans may be utilized. Institutional governing boards are required to adopt rules that govern loan terms, ensuring that they conform to the stipulations set forth in the legislation.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 3578 reflects an effort by the Texas Legislature to ensure that emergency loans are utilized effectively while maintaining responsible lending standards. Its enactment would likely lead to more transparent procedures in how public institutions manage emergency loans, thereby potentially enhancing student access to necessary funds during times of financial distress.

Contention

Although the text of HB 3578 does not indicate significant points of contention within the committee discussions or voting history, it does inherently address concerns relative to student debt. By streamlining emergency loan programs and defining their use, the bill may face scrutiny regarding the limits it places on financial assistance. Stakeholders interested in higher education funding may debate whether such regulations adequately support students' varied financial needs.