LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 19, 2011 TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3691 by Gallego (Relating to the provision by certain judges or community supervision and corrections departments of certain programs and services, including certain pretrial programs and services, and to the imposition of certain sanctions against defendants supervised by those departments.), As Engrossed No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Government Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The bill would change from permissive to a requirement that the Texas Board of Criminal Justice adopt rules regarding contracts between community supervision and corrections departments (CSCDs) and between judicial districts and CSCDs established for another judicial district. The bill would require criminal court judges to adopt a single system of progressive intermediate sanctions for violations of conditions of community supervision. The bill would require community supervision officers who impose a progressive sanction on an offender to conduct an administrative hearing if the offender objects to the sanction. The bill would add participation in a victim-offender mediation program as a condition determined by pre-trial hearings. The bill would provide courts authority to establish a victim-offender mediation program and direction in the operation of such a program. The Department of Criminal Justice anticipates no fiscal impact as a result of the bill. Local Government Impact Local governments could be negatively impacted by the provisions of the bill through increased administrative hearings and the operation of a victim-offender mediation program. The bill would require participants in the victim-offender mediation program to pay a fee, which could offset the costs to the counties. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG, AI
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 19, 2011
TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3691 by Gallego (Relating to the provision by certain judges or community supervision and corrections departments of certain programs and services, including certain pretrial programs and services, and to the imposition of certain sanctions against defendants supervised by those departments.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3691 by Gallego (Relating to the provision by certain judges or community supervision and corrections departments of certain programs and services, including certain pretrial programs and services, and to the imposition of certain sanctions against defendants supervised by those departments.), As Engrossed
Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3691 by Gallego (Relating to the provision by certain judges or community supervision and corrections departments of certain programs and services, including certain pretrial programs and services, and to the imposition of certain sanctions against defendants supervised by those departments.), As Engrossed
HB3691 by Gallego (Relating to the provision by certain judges or community supervision and corrections departments of certain programs and services, including certain pretrial programs and services, and to the imposition of certain sanctions against defendants supervised by those departments.), As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Government Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The bill would change from permissive to a requirement that the Texas Board of Criminal Justice adopt rules regarding contracts between community supervision and corrections departments (CSCDs) and between judicial districts and CSCDs established for another judicial district. The bill would require criminal court judges to adopt a single system of progressive intermediate sanctions for violations of conditions of community supervision. The bill would require community supervision officers who impose a progressive sanction on an offender to conduct an administrative hearing if the offender objects to the sanction. The bill would add participation in a victim-offender mediation program as a condition determined by pre-trial hearings. The bill would provide courts authority to establish a victim-offender mediation program and direction in the operation of such a program. The Department of Criminal Justice anticipates no fiscal impact as a result of the bill.
The bill would amend the Government Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The bill would change from permissive to a requirement that the Texas Board of Criminal Justice adopt rules regarding contracts between community supervision and corrections departments (CSCDs) and between judicial districts and CSCDs established for another judicial district.
The bill would require criminal court judges to adopt a single system of progressive intermediate sanctions for violations of conditions of community supervision. The bill would require community supervision officers who impose a progressive sanction on an offender to conduct an administrative hearing if the offender objects to the sanction.
The bill would add participation in a victim-offender mediation program as a condition determined by pre-trial hearings. The bill would provide courts authority to establish a victim-offender mediation program and direction in the operation of such a program.
The Department of Criminal Justice anticipates no fiscal impact as a result of the bill.
Local Government Impact
Local governments could be negatively impacted by the provisions of the bill through increased administrative hearings and the operation of a victim-offender mediation program. The bill would require participants in the victim-offender mediation program to pay a fee, which could offset the costs to the counties.
Local governments could be negatively impacted by the provisions of the bill through increased administrative hearings and the operation of a victim-offender mediation program. The bill would require participants in the victim-offender mediation program to pay a fee, which could offset the costs to the counties.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG, AI
JOB, ESi, GG, AI