LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 8, 2011 TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB37 by Menendez (Relating to the use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle; providing for penalties.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Section 545.425 of the Transportation Code to prohibit the use of a wireless communication device for calls or text-based communications while operating a motor vehicle unless the vehicle is in park, the parking brake is set, or the device is hands-free. The bill would establish an exception to an offense related to using a wireless communication device to include an emergency call to a law enforcement agency, but would not allow an exception for an emergency call made in a school crossing zone that does not have required signs posted. The bill would create a misdemeanor offense with fines of not more than $200 as defined by the provisions of the bill. The bill would repeal Section 545.425(b-1) of the Transportation Code which requires a municipality, county, or other political subdivision that bans the use of wireless communications devices in school zones to post a sign that notifies motor vehicle operators of the ban and that violators are subject to a fine. The Department of Public Safety reports programming changes will be needed to implement this bill, which would not have a significant fiscal impact. The Texas Department of Transportation reports that eliminating the need to replace existing school crossing zone signs would result in a savings and no costs would be incurred assuming existing school crossing zone signs could remain in place until the end of their normal life span. Local Government Impact Costs associated with enforcement and prosecution, and revenue gain from fines imposed and collected, would vary depending on the number of offenses committed. To the extent that any local entities already have a fine for this offense in place, a revenue loss could be experienced as a result of the fine structure created by this bill. However, the provisions of the bill are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact. Source Agencies:405 Department of Public Safety, 601 Department of Transportation LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, JI, MM, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 8, 2011
TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB37 by Menendez (Relating to the use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle; providing for penalties.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB37 by Menendez (Relating to the use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle; providing for penalties.), As Introduced
Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation
Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB37 by Menendez (Relating to the use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle; providing for penalties.), As Introduced
HB37 by Menendez (Relating to the use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle; providing for penalties.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend Section 545.425 of the Transportation Code to prohibit the use of a wireless communication device for calls or text-based communications while operating a motor vehicle unless the vehicle is in park, the parking brake is set, or the device is hands-free. The bill would establish an exception to an offense related to using a wireless communication device to include an emergency call to a law enforcement agency, but would not allow an exception for an emergency call made in a school crossing zone that does not have required signs posted. The bill would create a misdemeanor offense with fines of not more than $200 as defined by the provisions of the bill. The bill would repeal Section 545.425(b-1) of the Transportation Code which requires a municipality, county, or other political subdivision that bans the use of wireless communications devices in school zones to post a sign that notifies motor vehicle operators of the ban and that violators are subject to a fine. The Department of Public Safety reports programming changes will be needed to implement this bill, which would not have a significant fiscal impact. The Texas Department of Transportation reports that eliminating the need to replace existing school crossing zone signs would result in a savings and no costs would be incurred assuming existing school crossing zone signs could remain in place until the end of their normal life span.
The bill would amend Section 545.425 of the Transportation Code to prohibit the use of a wireless communication device for calls or text-based communications while operating a motor vehicle unless the vehicle is in park, the parking brake is set, or the device is hands-free. The bill would establish an exception to an offense related to using a wireless communication device to include an emergency call to a law enforcement agency, but would not allow an exception for an emergency call made in a school crossing zone that does not have required signs posted. The bill would create a misdemeanor offense with fines of not more than $200 as defined by the provisions of the bill.
The bill would repeal Section 545.425(b-1) of the Transportation Code which requires a municipality, county, or other political subdivision that bans the use of wireless communications devices in school zones to post a sign that notifies motor vehicle operators of the ban and that violators are subject to a fine.
The Department of Public Safety reports programming changes will be needed to implement this bill, which would not have a significant fiscal impact. The Texas Department of Transportation reports that eliminating the need to replace existing school crossing zone signs would result in a savings and no costs would be incurred assuming existing school crossing zone signs could remain in place until the end of their normal life span.
Local Government Impact
Costs associated with enforcement and prosecution, and revenue gain from fines imposed and collected, would vary depending on the number of offenses committed. To the extent that any local entities already have a fine for this offense in place, a revenue loss could be experienced as a result of the fine structure created by this bill. However, the provisions of the bill are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact.
Source Agencies: 405 Department of Public Safety, 601 Department of Transportation
405 Department of Public Safety, 601 Department of Transportation
LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, JI, MM, TP
JOB, KJG, JI, MM, TP