Texas House Bill HB3821

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/21/11
• Introduced: 3/22/11
• Voted on by House: 5/4/11
• Refer: 3/28/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/21/11
• Report Pass: 4/14/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Enrolled: 5/25/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to temporary directors and the continuation in existence of the Bolivar Yacht Basin Water Control and Improvement District No. 1 of Galveston County.

Impact

The bill emphasizes the continuity of the Bolivar Yacht Basin as a functioning entity by ensuring that temporary directors can be appointed or reappointed in a timely manner. This is crucial for local governance and management of water resources, particularly given the ongoing challenges with environmental compliance and water management in the region. Legislators believe that this will contribute to better governance and operational effectiveness of the district, aiding in the maintenance of infrastructure and services related to water supply and management.

Summary

House Bill 3821 focuses on the administration of the Bolivar Yacht Basin Water Control and Improvement District No. 1 located in Galveston County, Texas. The bill proposes amendments to the existing Special District Local Laws Code to facilitate the appointment and continuation of temporary directors within the district. This includes provisions for the lengths of their terms and how successor directors can be appointed after these terms expire based on the assessed value of property within the district. The intention is to maintain administrative continuity in the management of the Water Control and Improvement District.

Contention

One significant point of contention regarding HB 3821 arises from the governance model it endorses. While supporters argue that it provides necessary stability and ongoing leadership within the Bolivar Yacht Basin, opponents may express concerns about the lack of elected oversight in the governance of the district, which could lead to reduced accountability. The bill's provisions for appointing directors based on property value could also raise concerns about equitable representation and decision-making for residents who may not have significant property holdings in the area.