LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 6, 2011 TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB391 by Aycock (Relating to termination of a public school teacher's term contract and discharge of the teacher at any time on the basis of a school district's financial exigency.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would establish procedures governing school districts' declaration, continuation, and expiration of financial exigency when that situation serves as a basis for termination of certain contracts or discharge of a teacher. The bill would require that written notice of local board action declaring or continuing a financial exigency be provided to the commissioner of education. The bill would direct the commissioner of education to adopt rules prescribing the time and manner in which notice would be provided. Activities related to adoption of these rules are not anticipated to result in significant cost to the state. Local Government Impact The procedures and notification requirements established by the bill would not be anticipated to have significant fiscal implications for units of local government. Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JSp
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 6, 2011
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB391 by Aycock (Relating to termination of a public school teacher's term contract and discharge of the teacher at any time on the basis of a school district's financial exigency.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB391 by Aycock (Relating to termination of a public school teacher's term contract and discharge of the teacher at any time on the basis of a school district's financial exigency.), As Introduced
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB391 by Aycock (Relating to termination of a public school teacher's term contract and discharge of the teacher at any time on the basis of a school district's financial exigency.), As Introduced
HB391 by Aycock (Relating to termination of a public school teacher's term contract and discharge of the teacher at any time on the basis of a school district's financial exigency.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would establish procedures governing school districts' declaration, continuation, and expiration of financial exigency when that situation serves as a basis for termination of certain contracts or discharge of a teacher. The bill would require that written notice of local board action declaring or continuing a financial exigency be provided to the commissioner of education. The bill would direct the commissioner of education to adopt rules prescribing the time and manner in which notice would be provided. Activities related to adoption of these rules are not anticipated to result in significant cost to the state.
The bill would establish procedures governing school districts' declaration, continuation, and expiration of financial exigency when that situation serves as a basis for termination of certain contracts or discharge of a teacher. The bill would require that written notice of local board action declaring or continuing a financial exigency be provided to the commissioner of education. The bill would direct the commissioner of education to adopt rules prescribing the time and manner in which notice would be provided. Activities related to adoption of these rules are not anticipated to result in significant cost to the state.
Local Government Impact
The procedures and notification requirements established by the bill would not be anticipated to have significant fiscal implications for units of local government.
The procedures and notification requirements established by the bill would not be anticipated to have significant fiscal implications for units of local government.
Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency
701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JSp
JOB, LXH, JSp