Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB435 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 4, 2011      TO: Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB435 by Parker (Relating to suits affecting the parent-child relationship that involve an alleged father who has not registered with the paternity registry.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Family Code to remove the requirement that an alleged/unknown father who failed to register with the paternity registry is entitled to a court-appointed attorney in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.  The amendment is not anticipated to have a fiscal implication for court operations.  The bill would take effect September 1, 2011. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. To the extent court-appointed attorney fees paid by counties would be reduced by the amendments in this bill, the possible savings statewide is not anticipated to be significant.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council   LBB Staff:  JOB, JT, TB    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 4, 2011





  TO: Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB435 by Parker (Relating to suits affecting the parent-child relationship that involve an alleged father who has not registered with the paternity registry.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB435 by Parker (Relating to suits affecting the parent-child relationship that involve an alleged father who has not registered with the paternity registry.), As Introduced

 Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Jim Jackson, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB435 by Parker (Relating to suits affecting the parent-child relationship that involve an alleged father who has not registered with the paternity registry.), As Introduced

HB435 by Parker (Relating to suits affecting the parent-child relationship that involve an alleged father who has not registered with the paternity registry.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Family Code to remove the requirement that an alleged/unknown father who failed to register with the paternity registry is entitled to a court-appointed attorney in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.  The amendment is not anticipated to have a fiscal implication for court operations.  The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.

The bill would amend the Family Code to remove the requirement that an alleged/unknown father who failed to register with the paternity registry is entitled to a court-appointed attorney in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.  The amendment is not anticipated to have a fiscal implication for court operations.  The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. To the extent court-appointed attorney fees paid by counties would be reduced by the amendments in this bill, the possible savings statewide is not anticipated to be significant.

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

To the extent court-appointed attorney fees paid by counties would be reduced by the amendments in this bill, the possible savings statewide is not anticipated to be significant.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

LBB Staff: JOB, JT, TB

 JOB, JT, TB