LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION February 28, 2011 TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB443 by Fletcher (Relating to the amount of the fee paid by a defendant for a peace officer's services in executing or processing an arrest warrant, capias, or capias pro fine.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB443, As Introduced: a positive impact of $400,000 through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
February 28, 2011
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB443 by Fletcher (Relating to the amount of the fee paid by a defendant for a peace officer's services in executing or processing an arrest warrant, capias, or capias pro fine.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB443 by Fletcher (Relating to the amount of the fee paid by a defendant for a peace officer's services in executing or processing an arrest warrant, capias, or capias pro fine.), As Introduced
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB443 by Fletcher (Relating to the amount of the fee paid by a defendant for a peace officer's services in executing or processing an arrest warrant, capias, or capias pro fine.), As Introduced
HB443 by Fletcher (Relating to the amount of the fee paid by a defendant for a peace officer's services in executing or processing an arrest warrant, capias, or capias pro fine.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB443, As Introduced: a positive impact of $400,000 through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB443, As Introduced: a positive impact of $400,000 through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2012 $200,000 2013 $200,000 2014 $200,000 2015 $200,000 2016 $200,000
2012 $200,000
2013 $200,000
2014 $200,000
2015 $200,000
2016 $200,000
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 2012 $200,000 2013 $200,000 2014 $200,000 2015 $200,000 2016 $200,000
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 2012 $200,000 2013 $200,000 2014 $200,000 2015 $200,000 2016 $200,000
2012 $200,000
2013 $200,000
2014 $200,000
2015 $200,000
2016 $200,000
Fiscal Analysis
Section 1 of the bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 102.011(a) to increase an existing court cost related to peace officer services for executing or processing an arrest warrant, capias, or capias pro fine from $50 to $75.
Methodology
According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA) and the Office of Court Administration, the fee is charged once an individual is convicted of the offense that prompted the arrest warrant, with 80 percent of fee revenue deposited to the county's treasury and 20 percent remitted to the CPA, if the services are performed by a state peace officer. Currently this fee brings in over $1.0 million per year to the state and the CPA estimates that the changes made to this fee by the bill would bring in an additional $200,000 per year in General Revenue. Additional revenue to the state would depend upon the number of arrests using an arrest warrant, the number of convictions related to those warrants, and the number of arrest warrants served that involve a state peace officer.
Technology
No impact to technology is anticipated for state agencies.
Local Government Impact
According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA), the increase in the peace officer services fee would result in an additional revenue for local governments, the revenue increase would depend upone county population, number of arrests, and number of convictions. The CPA contacted three counties of varying population sizes to provide a sample of potential impact. For Harris County, it is estimated that this fee would result in $3.4 million in additional revenue per year starting in fiscal year 2012. For Bell County, it is estimated that this fee would result in $140,000 in additional revenue per year starting in fiscal year 2012. For Eastland County, it is estimated that this fee would result in $13,000 in additional revenue starting in fiscal year 2012.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, ZS, JJO, KKR, TB
JOB, ESi, ZS, JJO, KKR, TB