LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 19, 2011 TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB511 by Dutton (Relating to the closure of a school campus by the board of trustees of a school district.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB511, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($467,640) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 19, 2011
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB511 by Dutton (Relating to the closure of a school campus by the board of trustees of a school district.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB511 by Dutton (Relating to the closure of a school campus by the board of trustees of a school district.), As Introduced
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB511 by Dutton (Relating to the closure of a school campus by the board of trustees of a school district.), As Introduced
HB511 by Dutton (Relating to the closure of a school campus by the board of trustees of a school district.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB511, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($467,640) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB511, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($467,640) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2012 ($245,820) 2013 ($221,820) 2014 ($187,945) 2015 ($187,945) 2016 ($187,945)
2012 ($245,820)
2013 ($221,820)
2014 ($187,945)
2015 ($187,945)
2016 ($187,945)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2011 2012 ($245,820) 3.0 2013 ($221,820) 3.0 2014 ($187,945) 2.5 2015 ($187,945) 2.5 2016 ($187,945) 2.5
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2011 2012 ($245,820) 3.0 2013 ($221,820) 3.0 2014 ($187,945) 2.5 2015 ($187,945) 2.5 2016 ($187,945) 2.5
2012 ($245,820) 3.0
2013 ($221,820) 3.0
2014 ($187,945) 2.5
2015 ($187,945) 2.5
2016 ($187,945) 2.5
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would require the commissioner of education to review and approve the campus closure decisions of local school boards of trustees. Action to implement a campus closure decision would be contingent upon approval by the commissioner.
Methodology
The bill would have significant fiscal implications for the operations of the Texas Education Agency. The Agency's analysis of organization data indicate that on average about 140 schools were closed each year from 2008-2010. It is assumed for the purpose of this estimate that approvals would be required for an increased level of campus closures in 2012 and 2013 with campus closures each year thereafter falling to a level similar to the average observed for the 2008-2010 period. The Agency estimates costs for the 2012-2013 biennium totaling $467,640, with an additional 3.0 FTE positions needed to analyze information related to financial performance, academic performance, special program compliance, and proposals for re-drawing attendance zones for students of affected campuses. Under the assumption that campus closure actions would return to a level similar to the average observed for the 2008-2010 period beginning in FY14, the Agency estimates costs would decline to approximately $187,945 annually, with personnel requirements declining as well to 2.5FTEs.
Local Government Impact
School districts would incur costs associated with notifications and hearings required under the bill. Costs would vary among districts depending upon the number of campuses proposed for closure.
Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency
701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JGM, JSp
JOB, LXH, JGM, JSp