Texas House Bill HB571

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 3/25/11
• Introduced: 1/10/11
• Voted on by House: 4/6/11
• Refer: 2/18/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/4/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/9/11
• Governor Action: 5/21/11
• Refer: 4/20/11
• Report Pass: 5/4/11
• Enrolled: 5/10/11
• Passed: 5/21/11

Caption

Relating to the regulation of certain aggregate production operations by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; providing penalties.

Impact

The implications of HB 571 on state laws are significant as it formally outlines the responsibilities and operational mandates for aggregate production activities within Texas. By requiring registration and periodic inspections, the bill enhances environmental oversight and aims to ensure that aggregate operations comply with state standards related to environmental quality. Fees associated with registration have also been introduced, which will help fund the activities of the TCEQ related to regulation and enforcement in this sector.

Summary

House Bill 571 introduces regulations specifically aimed at aggregate production operations in Texas. This bill mandates that such operations register with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) before beginning extraction activities and requires annual renewal of this registration. Furthermore, the bill delineates a series of definitions pertinent to the classification of aggregate production operations and the types of aggregates involved in these processes. It also establishes a framework for inspections to ensure compliance with environmental laws, highlighting that inspections must be conducted at least once every three years.

Contention

Despite the public safety and environmental considerations at the forefront of this bill, there are points of contention among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill is crucial for regulating a sector that can significantly impact local environments and sustainable practices in construction. They emphasize the importance of oversight to prevent potential ecological damage. However, opponents of the bill may voice concerns regarding the financial burden that registration and compliance fees may impose on smaller operators, potentially leading to market consolidation and decreased competition within the industry.