LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION February 27, 2011 TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB734 by Patrick, Diane (Relating to the jurisdiction of constitutional county courts over truancy cases and the appointment of magistrates to hear truancy cases in certain counties.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. Generally, the criminal offenses of failure to attend school and parent contributing to nonattendance are adjudicated in justice and municipal courts. However, under current law, in counties with populations of 2 million or more (Harris and Dallas counties), an option exists to file these cases in the constitutional county court. The bill would expand this option to counties with populations of 1.4 million or more adding Tarrant County and Bexar County to the counties so authorized. Additional expenses, if any, would be borne by the affected counties and not by the state. Local Government Impact The number of relevant cases adjudicated will not be increased in the two affected counties. It is assumed that these cases would generally be handled by special magistrates on behalf of the constitutional county courts. While the overall cost of adjudicating truancy cases would not be significantly different, expenses would be shifted from justice and municipal courts to the constitutional county courts in the counties affected by this bill. Savings realized by justice and municipal courts would be offset by costs realized by constitutional county courts. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JGM, JSp, KKR
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
February 27, 2011
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB734 by Patrick, Diane (Relating to the jurisdiction of constitutional county courts over truancy cases and the appointment of magistrates to hear truancy cases in certain counties.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB734 by Patrick, Diane (Relating to the jurisdiction of constitutional county courts over truancy cases and the appointment of magistrates to hear truancy cases in certain counties.), As Introduced
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB734 by Patrick, Diane (Relating to the jurisdiction of constitutional county courts over truancy cases and the appointment of magistrates to hear truancy cases in certain counties.), As Introduced
HB734 by Patrick, Diane (Relating to the jurisdiction of constitutional county courts over truancy cases and the appointment of magistrates to hear truancy cases in certain counties.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
Generally, the criminal offenses of failure to attend school and parent contributing to nonattendance are adjudicated in justice and municipal courts. However, under current law, in counties with populations of 2 million or more (Harris and Dallas counties), an option exists to file these cases in the constitutional county court. The bill would expand this option to counties with populations of 1.4 million or more adding Tarrant County and Bexar County to the counties so authorized. Additional expenses, if any, would be borne by the affected counties and not by the state.
Local Government Impact
The number of relevant cases adjudicated will not be increased in the two affected counties. It is assumed that these cases would generally be handled by special magistrates on behalf of the constitutional county courts. While the overall cost of adjudicating truancy cases would not be significantly different, expenses would be shifted from justice and municipal courts to the constitutional county courts in the counties affected by this bill. Savings realized by justice and municipal courts would be offset by costs realized by constitutional county courts.
The number of relevant cases adjudicated will not be increased in the two affected counties. It is assumed that these cases would generally be handled by special magistrates on behalf of the constitutional county courts. While the overall cost of adjudicating truancy cases would not be significantly different, expenses would be shifted from justice and municipal courts to the constitutional county courts in the counties affected by this bill. Savings realized by justice and municipal courts would be offset by costs realized by constitutional county courts.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 701 Central Education Agency
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JGM, JSp, KKR
JOB, LXH, JGM, JSp, KKR