Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB9 Enrolled / Bill

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    H.B. No. 9


 AN ACT
 relating to student success-based funding for and reporting
 regarding public institutions of higher education.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  This Act shall be known as the Higher Education
 Outcomes-Based Funding Act.
 SECTION 2.  Section 61.059, Education Code, is amended by
 amending Subsections (a) and (c) and adding Subsection (b-1) to
 read as follows:
 (a)  To finance a system of higher education and to secure an
 equitable distribution of state funds deemed to be available for
 higher education, the board shall perform the functions described
 in this section. Funding policies shall:
 (1)  allocate resources efficiently and provide
 incentives for programs of superior quality and for institutional
 diversity;
 (2)  provide incentives for supporting the five-year
 master plan developed and revised under Section 61.051; [and]
 (3)  discourage unnecessary duplication of course
 offerings between institutions and unnecessary construction on any
 campus; and
 (4)  emphasize an alignment with education goals
 established by the board.
 (b-1)  A committee under Subsection (b) must be composed of
 representatives of a cross-section of institutions representing
 each of the institutional groupings under the board's
 accountability system. The commissioner of higher education shall
 solicit recommendations for the committee's membership from the
 chancellor of each university system and from the president of each
 institution of higher education that is not a component of a
 university system. The chancellor of a university system shall
 recommend to the commissioner at least one institutional
 representative for each institutional grouping to which a component
 of the university system is assigned. The president of an
 institution of higher education that is not a component of a
 university system shall recommend to the commissioner at least one
 institutional representative for the institutional grouping to
 which the institution is assigned.
 (c)  Formulas for basic funding shall:
 (1)  reflect the role and mission of each institution;
 (2)  [, shall] emphasize funding elements that directly
 support faculty;
 (3)  [, and shall] reflect both fixed and variable
 elements of cost; and
 (4)  incorporate, as the board considers appropriate,
 goals identified in the board's long-range statewide plan developed
 under Section 61.051.
 SECTION 3.  Subchapter C, Chapter 61, Education Code, is
 amended by adding Section 61.0593 to read as follows:
 Sec. 61.0593.  STUDENT SUCCESS-BASED FUNDING
 RECOMMENDATIONS. (a) The legislature finds that it is in the
 state's highest public interest to evaluate student achievement at
 institutions of higher education and to develop higher education
 funding policy based on that evaluation. Funding policies that
 promote postsecondary educational success based on objective
 indicators of relative performance, such as degree completion
 rates, are critical to maintaining the state's competitiveness in
 the national and global economy and supporting the general welfare
 of this state. Therefore, the purpose of this section is to ensure
 that institutions of higher education produce student outcomes that
 are directly aligned with the state's education goals and economic
 development needs.
 (b)  In this section:
 (1)  "At-risk student" means an undergraduate student
 of an institution of higher education:
 (A)  who has been awarded a grant under the
 federal Pell Grant program; or
 (B)  who, on the date the student initially
 enrolled in the institution:
 (i)  was 20 years of age or older;
 (ii)  had a score on the Scholastic
 Assessment Test (SAT) or the American College Test (ACT) that was
 less than the national mean score for students taking that test;
 (iii)  was enrolled as a part-time student;
 or
 (iv)  had not received a high school diploma
 but had received a high school equivalency certificate within the
 last six years.
 (2)  "Critical field" means a field of study designated
 as a critical field under Subsection (c).
 (c)  Except as otherwise provided under Subdivision (2), the
 fields of engineering, computer science, mathematics, physical
 science, allied health, nursing, and teaching certification in the
 field of science or mathematics are critical fields. Beginning
 September 1, 2012, the board, based on the board's determination of
 those fields of study in which the support and development of
 postsecondary education programs at the bachelor's degree level are
 most critically necessary for serving the needs of this state, by
 rule may:
 (1)  designate as a critical field a field of study that
 is not currently designated by this subsection or by the board as a
 critical field; or
 (2)  remove a field of study from the list of fields
 currently designated by this subsection or by the board as critical
 fields.
 (d)  This subsection applies only to a general academic
 teaching institution other than a public state college.  In
 devising its funding formulas and making its recommendations to the
 legislature relating to institutional appropriations of funds
 under Section 61.059 for institutions to which this subsection
 applies, the board, in the manner and to the extent the board
 considers appropriate and in consultation with those institutions,
 shall incorporate the consideration of undergraduate student
 success measures achieved during the preceding state fiscal
 biennium by each of the institutions. At the time the board makes
 those recommendations, the board shall also make recommendations
 for incorporating the success measures, to the extent the board
 considers appropriate in consultation with those institutions,
 into the distribution of any incentive funds available for those
 institutions, including performance incentive funds under
 Subchapter D, Chapter 62. The board's recommendations must provide
 alternative approaches for applying the success measures and must
 compare the effects on funding of applying the success measures
 within the formula for base funding to applying the success
 measures as a separate formula. The success measures considered by
 the board under this subsection may include:
 (1)  the total number of bachelor's degrees awarded by
 the institution;
 (2)  the total number of bachelor's degrees in critical
 fields awarded by the institution;
 (3)  the total number of bachelor's degrees awarded by
 the institution to at-risk students; and
 (4)  as determined by the board, the six-year
 graduation rate of undergraduate students of the institution who
 initially enrolled in the institution in the fall semester
 immediately following their graduation from a public high school in
 this state as compared to the six-year graduation rate predicted
 for those students based on the composition of the institution's
 student body.
 (e)  Notwithstanding Subsection (d):
 (1)  not more than 10 percent of the total amount of
 general revenue appropriations of base funds for undergraduate
 education recommended by the board for all institutions to which
 Subsection (d) applies for a state fiscal biennium may be based on
 student success measures; and
 (2)  the board's recommendation for base funding for
 undergraduate education based on student success measures does not
 reduce or otherwise affect funding recommendations for graduate
 education.
 (f)  This subsection applies only to public junior colleges,
 public state colleges, and public technical institutes. In
 devising its funding formulas and making its recommendations to the
 legislature relating to institutional appropriations of incentive
 funds for institutions to which this subsection applies, the board,
 in the manner and to the extent the board considers appropriate and
 in consultation with those institutions, shall incorporate the
 consideration of the undergraduate student success measures
 achieved during the preceding state fiscal biennium by each of the
 institutions. The success measures considered by the board under
 this subsection may include:
 (1)  the following academic progress measures achieved
 by students at the institution:
 (A)  successful completion of:
 (i)  developmental education in
 mathematics;
 (ii)  developmental education in English;
 (iii)  the first college-level mathematics
 course with a grade of "C" or higher;
 (iv)  the first college-level English course
 with a grade of "C" or higher; and
 (v)  the first 30 semester credit hours at
 the institution; and
 (B)  transfer to a four-year college or university
 after successful completion of at least 15 semester credit hours at
 the institution; and
 (2)  the total number of the following awarded by the
 institution:
 (A)  associate's degrees;
 (B)  bachelor's degrees under Section 130.0012;
 and
 (C)  certificates identified by the board for
 purposes of this section as effective measures of student success.
 (g)  Biennially, the board, in consultation with
 institutions to which Subsections (d) and (f) apply, shall review
 the student success measures considered by the board under those
 subsections.
 (h)  The board shall include in its findings and
 recommendations to the legislature under Section 61.059:
 (1)  an evaluation of the effectiveness of the student
 success measures described by this section in achieving the purpose
 of this section during the preceding state fiscal biennium; and
 (2)  any related recommendations the board considers
 appropriate.
 (i)  The board shall adopt rules for the administration of
 this section, including rules requiring each institution of higher
 education to submit to the board any student data or other
 information the board considers necessary for the board to carry
 out its duties under this section.
 SECTION 4.  Subchapter C, Chapter 61, Education Code, is
 amended by adding Section 61.0905 to read as follows:
 Sec. 61.0905.  REPORTS TO JOINT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. (a)
 Not later than September 30, 2011, and subsequently not later than
 July 1, 2012, the board shall submit to the Joint Oversight
 Committee on Higher Education Governance, Excellence, and
 Transparency a written report reviewing, comparing, and
 highlighting national and global best practices on:
 (1)  improving student outcomes, including student
 retention, graduations, and graduation rates; and
 (2)  higher education governance, administration, and
 transparency.
 (b)  This section expires August 31, 2013.
 SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
 Act takes effect September 1, 2011.
 ______________________________ ______________________________
 President of the Senate Speaker of the House
 I certify that H.B. No. 9 was passed by the House on May 13,
 2011, by the following vote:  Yeas 118, Nays 22, 1 present, not
 voting; and that the House concurred in Senate amendments to H.B.
 No. 9 on May 27, 2011, by the following vote:  Yeas 127, Nays 14, 2
 present, not voting.
 ______________________________
 Chief Clerk of the House
 I certify that H.B. No. 9 was passed by the Senate, with
 amendments, on May 24, 2011, by the following vote:  Yeas 30, Nays
 0.
 ______________________________
 Secretary of the Senate
 APPROVED: __________________
 Date
 __________________
 Governor