LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION Revision 2 April 12, 2011 TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB928 by Harper-Brown (Relating to requiring the use of an ignition interlock device on conviction of certain intoxication offenses.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB928, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
Revision 2
April 12, 2011
Revision 2
Revision 2
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB928 by Harper-Brown (Relating to requiring the use of an ignition interlock device on conviction of certain intoxication offenses.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB928 by Harper-Brown (Relating to requiring the use of an ignition interlock device on conviction of certain intoxication offenses.), As Introduced
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB928 by Harper-Brown (Relating to requiring the use of an ignition interlock device on conviction of certain intoxication offenses.), As Introduced
HB928 by Harper-Brown (Relating to requiring the use of an ignition interlock device on conviction of certain intoxication offenses.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB928, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB928, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2012 $0 2013 $0 2014 $0 2015 $0 2016 $0
2012 $0
2013 $0
2014 $0
2015 $0
2016 $0
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable (Cost) fromState Highway Fund6 Probable (Cost) fromOper & Chauffeurs Lic Ac99 Probable Revenue Gain fromTexas Mobility Fund365 2012 ($145,609) ($1,109,732) $240,720 2013 ($134,354) ($991,686) $240,720 2014 ($126,756) ($989,604) $240,720 2015 ($129,295) ($1,009,430) $240,720 2016 ($126,756) ($989,604) $240,720
Fiscal Year Probable (Cost) fromState Highway Fund6 Probable (Cost) fromOper & Chauffeurs Lic Ac99 Probable Revenue Gain fromTexas Mobility Fund365 2012 ($145,609) ($1,109,732) $240,720 2013 ($134,354) ($991,686) $240,720 2014 ($126,756) ($989,604) $240,720 2015 ($129,295) ($1,009,430) $240,720 2016 ($126,756) ($989,604) $240,720
2012 ($145,609) ($1,109,732) $240,720
2013 ($134,354) ($991,686) $240,720
2014 ($126,756) ($989,604) $240,720
2015 ($129,295) ($1,009,430) $240,720
2016 ($126,756) ($989,604) $240,720
Fiscal Year Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2011 2012 17.0 2013 17.0 2014 17.0 2015 17.0 2016 17.0 Fiscal Analysis The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure and Transportation Code to require a court when placing a person on community supervision for certain intoxication offenses to require the person to have an ignition interlock device placed on their vehicle or the vehicle they most often drive. The bill would remove from statute other procedures related to requiring a person placed on community supervision to have an ignition interlock device. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011. Methodology The Department of Public Safety (DPS) estimates 24,072 persons were placed on community supervision for the intoxication offenses that would require an ignition interlock device (IID) under the provisions of the bill. Assuming the same number of persons would receive community supervision in future years, this would result in a gain to the Texas Mobility Fund of $240,720 each year because each person issued an IID would be required to pay a $10 fee to obtain a driver's license with an IID restriction. The bill would require all offenders receiving community supervision for the applicable intoxication offenses to have an ignition interlock device (IID) placed on their vehicle. DPS is responsible for auditing and testing the entities who provide the IIDs throughout the state and issuing licenses for each IID. The increased demand for IIDs due to the provisions of the bill will likely require DPS to audit and test additional entities who provide IIDs. DPS will require additional full-time employees to process IID licenses and customer service inquiries. DPS assumes there will be a 25 percent increase in the entities who provide IIDs as a result of the provisions of the bill; DPS will also require additional FTEs to adequately inspect and audit the additional entities. One additional Administrative Assistant IV would be required to process the additional IID licenses and one Customer Service Representative IV would be required to field the additional customer support expected. These full-time employees (FTEs) would be funded through the State Highway Fund. Thirteen additional Inspector IVs would be required to adequately inspect and audit the anticipated 25% growth in the number of IID providers, and one Program Specialist I would be required to supervise the additional Inspector IVs. One Accountant V will be required to provide accounting and various financial management issues for the additional employees. These FTEs would be funded through the Operator and Chauffeurs License Account. Additional expenses for the supplies and support of all the additional FTEs is also included in this analysis. Technology DPS will require contractors for systems analysis, programming, and database administration support for logic and database changes at a cost of $32,500 in fiscal year 2012 and $21,060 in fiscal year 2013. Local Government Impact The bill would require a defendant granted community supervision under the provisions of the bill to have an ignition interlock device installed on the vehicle most regularly driven by the defendant. Local community supervision and corrections departments (CSCDs) would face lost revenue if defendants who would otherwise pay probation fees would now pay fees for the device but would be unable to pay probation fees. Brazos County community CSCD anticipates lost revenue of $75,000 annually due to defendants failure to pay fees associated with the bill. Angelina County CSCD anticipates lost revenue of $5,000 due to defendants failure to pay and costs of $20,000 annually in new staff to oversee offenders. Williamson County CSCD anticipates $25,000 of lost revenue for fiscal year (FY) 2012, and $118,000 in costs for new staff to oversee offenders. Williamson County estimates that these costs will rise by 10 to 12 percent per year. Bexar County CSCD anticipates a one-time cost of $55,000 in FY 2012 for automobiles and equipment in addition to $187,000 for new staff and automobile maintenance and $708,200 in lost revenue due to defendants failure to pay. Except for the cost for automobiles and equipment (which only affects FY 2012), costs are expected to rise approximately 5 percent per year. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety, 696 Department of Criminal Justice LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, KKR, TP, GG, LM, TB
Fiscal Year Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2011 2012 17.0 2013 17.0 2014 17.0 2015 17.0 2016 17.0
2012 17.0
2013 17.0
2014 17.0
2015 17.0
2016 17.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure and Transportation Code to require a court when placing a person on community supervision for certain intoxication offenses to require the person to have an ignition interlock device placed on their vehicle or the vehicle they most often drive. The bill would remove from statute other procedures related to requiring a person placed on community supervision to have an ignition interlock device. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure and Transportation Code to require a court when placing a person on community supervision for certain intoxication offenses to require the person to have an ignition interlock device placed on their vehicle or the vehicle they most often drive. The bill would remove from statute other procedures related to requiring a person placed on community supervision to have an ignition interlock device. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
Methodology
The Department of Public Safety (DPS) estimates 24,072 persons were placed on community supervision for the intoxication offenses that would require an ignition interlock device (IID) under the provisions of the bill. Assuming the same number of persons would receive community supervision in future years, this would result in a gain to the Texas Mobility Fund of $240,720 each year because each person issued an IID would be required to pay a $10 fee to obtain a driver's license with an IID restriction. The bill would require all offenders receiving community supervision for the applicable intoxication offenses to have an ignition interlock device (IID) placed on their vehicle. DPS is responsible for auditing and testing the entities who provide the IIDs throughout the state and issuing licenses for each IID. The increased demand for IIDs due to the provisions of the bill will likely require DPS to audit and test additional entities who provide IIDs. DPS will require additional full-time employees to process IID licenses and customer service inquiries. DPS assumes there will be a 25 percent increase in the entities who provide IIDs as a result of the provisions of the bill; DPS will also require additional FTEs to adequately inspect and audit the additional entities. One additional Administrative Assistant IV would be required to process the additional IID licenses and one Customer Service Representative IV would be required to field the additional customer support expected. These full-time employees (FTEs) would be funded through the State Highway Fund. Thirteen additional Inspector IVs would be required to adequately inspect and audit the anticipated 25% growth in the number of IID providers, and one Program Specialist I would be required to supervise the additional Inspector IVs. One Accountant V will be required to provide accounting and various financial management issues for the additional employees. These FTEs would be funded through the Operator and Chauffeurs License Account. Additional expenses for the supplies and support of all the additional FTEs is also included in this analysis.
The Department of Public Safety (DPS) estimates 24,072 persons were placed on community supervision for the intoxication offenses that would require an ignition interlock device (IID) under the provisions of the bill. Assuming the same number of persons would receive community supervision in future years, this would result in a gain to the Texas Mobility Fund of $240,720 each year because each person issued an IID would be required to pay a $10 fee to obtain a driver's license with an IID restriction.
The bill would require all offenders receiving community supervision for the applicable intoxication offenses to have an ignition interlock device (IID) placed on their vehicle. DPS is responsible for auditing and testing the entities who provide the IIDs throughout the state and issuing licenses for each IID. The increased demand for IIDs due to the provisions of the bill will likely require DPS to audit and test additional entities who provide IIDs. DPS will require additional full-time employees to process IID licenses and customer service inquiries. DPS assumes there will be a 25 percent increase in the entities who provide IIDs as a result of the provisions of the bill; DPS will also require additional FTEs to adequately inspect and audit the additional entities.
One additional Administrative Assistant IV would be required to process the additional IID licenses and one Customer Service Representative IV would be required to field the additional customer support expected. These full-time employees (FTEs) would be funded through the State Highway Fund. Thirteen additional Inspector IVs would be required to adequately inspect and audit the anticipated 25% growth in the number of IID providers, and one Program Specialist I would be required to supervise the additional Inspector IVs. One Accountant V will be required to provide accounting and various financial management issues for the additional employees. These FTEs would be funded through the Operator and Chauffeurs License Account. Additional expenses for the supplies and support of all the additional FTEs is also included in this analysis.
Technology
DPS will require contractors for systems analysis, programming, and database administration support for logic and database changes at a cost of $32,500 in fiscal year 2012 and $21,060 in fiscal year 2013.
Local Government Impact
The bill would require a defendant granted community supervision under the provisions of the bill to have an ignition interlock device installed on the vehicle most regularly driven by the defendant. Local community supervision and corrections departments (CSCDs) would face lost revenue if defendants who would otherwise pay probation fees would now pay fees for the device but would be unable to pay probation fees. Brazos County community CSCD anticipates lost revenue of $75,000 annually due to defendants failure to pay fees associated with the bill. Angelina County CSCD anticipates lost revenue of $5,000 due to defendants failure to pay and costs of $20,000 annually in new staff to oversee offenders. Williamson County CSCD anticipates $25,000 of lost revenue for fiscal year (FY) 2012, and $118,000 in costs for new staff to oversee offenders. Williamson County estimates that these costs will rise by 10 to 12 percent per year. Bexar County CSCD anticipates a one-time cost of $55,000 in FY 2012 for automobiles and equipment in addition to $187,000 for new staff and automobile maintenance and $708,200 in lost revenue due to defendants failure to pay. Except for the cost for automobiles and equipment (which only affects FY 2012), costs are expected to rise approximately 5 percent per year.
The bill would require a defendant granted community supervision under the provisions of the bill to have an ignition interlock device installed on the vehicle most regularly driven by the defendant. Local community supervision and corrections departments (CSCDs) would face lost revenue if defendants who would otherwise pay probation fees would now pay fees for the device but would be unable to pay probation fees.
Brazos County community CSCD anticipates lost revenue of $75,000 annually due to defendants failure to pay fees associated with the bill.
Angelina County CSCD anticipates lost revenue of $5,000 due to defendants failure to pay and costs of $20,000 annually in new staff to oversee offenders.
Williamson County CSCD anticipates $25,000 of lost revenue for fiscal year (FY) 2012, and $118,000 in costs for new staff to oversee offenders. Williamson County estimates that these costs will rise by 10 to 12 percent per year.
Bexar County CSCD anticipates a one-time cost of $55,000 in FY 2012 for automobiles and equipment in addition to $187,000 for new staff and automobile maintenance and $708,200 in lost revenue due to defendants failure to pay. Except for the cost for automobiles and equipment (which only affects FY 2012), costs are expected to rise approximately 5 percent per year.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety, 696 Department of Criminal Justice
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety, 696 Department of Criminal Justice
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, KKR, TP, GG, LM, TB
JOB, ESi, KKR, TP, GG, LM, TB