LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 27, 2011 TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1042 by Hegar (Relating to the eligibility of employees convicted of certain offenses to provide services under a contract with a public school.), As Engrossed No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would prohibit a contracting entity from allowing an employee to provide services at a school if the employee has been convicted of certain criminal offenses. The provisions of the bill would apply regardless of whether the contract was entered into before or after the effective date of the bill. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JGM, JSc
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 27, 2011
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1042 by Hegar (Relating to the eligibility of employees convicted of certain offenses to provide services under a contract with a public school.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1042 by Hegar (Relating to the eligibility of employees convicted of certain offenses to provide services under a contract with a public school.), As Engrossed
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1042 by Hegar (Relating to the eligibility of employees convicted of certain offenses to provide services under a contract with a public school.), As Engrossed
SB1042 by Hegar (Relating to the eligibility of employees convicted of certain offenses to provide services under a contract with a public school.), As Engrossed
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would prohibit a contracting entity from allowing an employee to provide services at a school if the employee has been convicted of certain criminal offenses. The provisions of the bill would apply regardless of whether the contract was entered into before or after the effective date of the bill.
The bill would prohibit a contracting entity from allowing an employee to provide services at a school if the employee has been convicted of certain criminal offenses.
The provisions of the bill would apply regardless of whether the contract was entered into before or after the effective date of the bill.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency
701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JGM, JSc
JOB, LXH, JGM, JSc