Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1095 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 15, 2011      TO: Honorable Tommy Williams, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1095 by Rodriguez (Relating to the posting of signs in school crossing zones regarding the prohibited use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  Current law requires a municipality, county, or other political subdivision to post a sign at each school crossing zone informing vehicle operators that the use of a wireless communication device is prohibited in the school zone. The bill would amend the Transportation Code to exempt a municipality, county, or other political subdivision that prohibits the use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle within its entire jurisdiction from the sign requirement. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) reported it posts signs related to the prohibition of the use of wireless communication devices in a school zone on the state highway system in cities with a population of less than 50,000 and in rural areas. TxDOT anticipates that any fiscal impact resulting from the bill would not be significant. Local Government Impact There could be a savings to a political subdivision that currently has a jurisdiction-wide ban on the use of wireless communication devices that would not be required to post signs. According to the analysis by TxDOT, larger cities, such as Austin and El Paso that currently have existing city-wide bans could experience a more significant savings from the provisions of the bill, but the overall fiscal impact cannot be estimated.    Source Agencies:405 Department of Public Safety, 601 Department of Transportation   LBB Staff:  JOB, TP, MM, KJG, JI    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 15, 2011





  TO: Honorable Tommy Williams, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1095 by Rodriguez (Relating to the posting of signs in school crossing zones regarding the prohibited use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Tommy Williams, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1095 by Rodriguez (Relating to the posting of signs in school crossing zones regarding the prohibited use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle.), As Introduced

 Honorable Tommy Williams, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security 

 Honorable Tommy Williams, Chair, Senate Committee on Transportation & Homeland Security 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB1095 by Rodriguez (Relating to the posting of signs in school crossing zones regarding the prohibited use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle.), As Introduced

SB1095 by Rodriguez (Relating to the posting of signs in school crossing zones regarding the prohibited use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



Current law requires a municipality, county, or other political subdivision to post a sign at each school crossing zone informing vehicle operators that the use of a wireless communication device is prohibited in the school zone. The bill would amend the Transportation Code to exempt a municipality, county, or other political subdivision that prohibits the use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle within its entire jurisdiction from the sign requirement. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) reported it posts signs related to the prohibition of the use of wireless communication devices in a school zone on the state highway system in cities with a population of less than 50,000 and in rural areas. TxDOT anticipates that any fiscal impact resulting from the bill would not be significant.

Current law requires a municipality, county, or other political subdivision to post a sign at each school crossing zone informing vehicle operators that the use of a wireless communication device is prohibited in the school zone. The bill would amend the Transportation Code to exempt a municipality, county, or other political subdivision that prohibits the use of a wireless communication device while operating a motor vehicle within its entire jurisdiction from the sign requirement. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) reported it posts signs related to the prohibition of the use of wireless communication devices in a school zone on the state highway system in cities with a population of less than 50,000 and in rural areas. TxDOT anticipates that any fiscal impact resulting from the bill would not be significant.

Local Government Impact

There could be a savings to a political subdivision that currently has a jurisdiction-wide ban on the use of wireless communication devices that would not be required to post signs. According to the analysis by TxDOT, larger cities, such as Austin and El Paso that currently have existing city-wide bans could experience a more significant savings from the provisions of the bill, but the overall fiscal impact cannot be estimated.

There could be a savings to a political subdivision that currently has a jurisdiction-wide ban on the use of wireless communication devices that would not be required to post signs. According to the analysis by TxDOT, larger cities, such as Austin and El Paso that currently have existing city-wide bans could experience a more significant savings from the provisions of the bill, but the overall fiscal impact cannot be estimated.

Source Agencies: 405 Department of Public Safety, 601 Department of Transportation

405 Department of Public Safety, 601 Department of Transportation

LBB Staff: JOB, TP, MM, KJG, JI

 JOB, TP, MM, KJG, JI