LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 10, 2011 TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1138 by Watson (Relating to design-build contracts and comprehensive development agreements of regional mobility authorities.), As Engrossed No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Transportation Code to relating to design-build contracts and comprehensive development agreements of regional mobility authorities (RMA). The bill would provide that a comprehensive development agreement is an agreement with a private entity that provides for the design and construction of a transportation project that may provide for the financing, acquisition, maintenance, or operation of a transportation project and that entitles a private entity to a leasehold interest or the right to operate or retain revenue from the project. The bill would add Subchapter G-1 to Chapter 370 to include the definitions for "design-build contractor" and design-build method and would authorize a regional mobility authority to use the design-build method for a transportation project. A design-build contract under this subchapter would not grant to a private entity, a leasehold interest or the right to operate or retain revenue from the project. The bill would outline procedures for the use of the design-build method including the scope and limitations on contracts; request for qualifications and proposals; contract negotiations; and performance or payment bonds. The bill would repeal Section 370.314 of the Transportation Code. Local Government Impact It is assumed that an RMA would enter into a comprehensive development agreement or use the design-build method authorized by the provisions of the bill only if sufficient funds were available. The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority reported there would be no fiscal impact to implement the provisions of the bill. The Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority reported there could be a positive fiscal impact because it would increase the possibility that an RMA could build a transportation project due to greater financing flexibility. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 10, 2011
TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1138 by Watson (Relating to design-build contracts and comprehensive development agreements of regional mobility authorities.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1138 by Watson (Relating to design-build contracts and comprehensive development agreements of regional mobility authorities.), As Engrossed
Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation
Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Transportation
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1138 by Watson (Relating to design-build contracts and comprehensive development agreements of regional mobility authorities.), As Engrossed
SB1138 by Watson (Relating to design-build contracts and comprehensive development agreements of regional mobility authorities.), As Engrossed
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Transportation Code to relating to design-build contracts and comprehensive development agreements of regional mobility authorities (RMA). The bill would provide that a comprehensive development agreement is an agreement with a private entity that provides for the design and construction of a transportation project that may provide for the financing, acquisition, maintenance, or operation of a transportation project and that entitles a private entity to a leasehold interest or the right to operate or retain revenue from the project. The bill would add Subchapter G-1 to Chapter 370 to include the definitions for "design-build contractor" and design-build method and would authorize a regional mobility authority to use the design-build method for a transportation project. A design-build contract under this subchapter would not grant to a private entity, a leasehold interest or the right to operate or retain revenue from the project. The bill would outline procedures for the use of the design-build method including the scope and limitations on contracts; request for qualifications and proposals; contract negotiations; and performance or payment bonds. The bill would repeal Section 370.314 of the Transportation Code.
Local Government Impact
It is assumed that an RMA would enter into a comprehensive development agreement or use the design-build method authorized by the provisions of the bill only if sufficient funds were available. The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority reported there would be no fiscal impact to implement the provisions of the bill. The Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority reported there could be a positive fiscal impact because it would increase the possibility that an RMA could build a transportation project due to greater financing flexibility.
It is assumed that an RMA would enter into a comprehensive development agreement or use the design-build method authorized by the provisions of the bill only if sufficient funds were available.
The Alamo Regional Mobility Authority reported there would be no fiscal impact to implement the provisions of the bill.
The Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority reported there could be a positive fiscal impact because it would increase the possibility that an RMA could build a transportation project due to greater financing flexibility.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, TP
JOB, KJG, TP