LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 20, 2011 TO: Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB116 by Uresti (Relating to protective orders against dating violence.), As Passed 2nd House No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Family Code relating to protective orders safeguarding persons in dating relationships. The bill would amend the definition of dating violence to expand the number of situations in which the issuance of a protective order by a court would be appropriate. To the extent the bill would amend the definition of dating violence; the change is not anticipated to increase the workload of the courts statewide. The bill would take effect immediately upon receiving a two-thirds vote by houses. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2011. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TB, JT
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 20, 2011
TO: Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB116 by Uresti (Relating to protective orders against dating violence.), As Passed 2nd House
TO: Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB116 by Uresti (Relating to protective orders against dating violence.), As Passed 2nd House
Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB116 by Uresti (Relating to protective orders against dating violence.), As Passed 2nd House
SB116 by Uresti (Relating to protective orders against dating violence.), As Passed 2nd House
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Family Code relating to protective orders safeguarding persons in dating relationships. The bill would amend the definition of dating violence to expand the number of situations in which the issuance of a protective order by a court would be appropriate. To the extent the bill would amend the definition of dating violence; the change is not anticipated to increase the workload of the courts statewide. The bill would take effect immediately upon receiving a two-thirds vote by houses. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
The bill would amend the Family Code relating to protective orders safeguarding persons in dating relationships. The bill would amend the definition of dating violence to expand the number of situations in which the issuance of a protective order by a court would be appropriate. To the extent the bill would amend the definition of dating violence; the change is not anticipated to increase the workload of the courts statewide. The bill would take effect immediately upon receiving a two-thirds vote by houses. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TB, JT
JOB, ESi, TB, JT