Texas Senate Bill SB1191

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/4/11
• Refer: 3/16/11

Caption

Relating to the criminal registration procedure for a convicted arsonist.

Impact

The anticipated impact of SB1191 on state laws includes the clarification of registration processes for arsonists and an emphasis on public notification when civilly committed individuals are released. This amendment aims to ensure that both law enforcement and communities are adequately informed about the presence of such individuals in their neighborhoods. By mandating that local law enforcement removes registration information when required, the bill addresses potential public safety concerns while also considering the rights of those previously convicted.

Summary

Senate Bill 1191 proposes amendments to the criminal registration requirements specific to individuals convicted of arson. The bill outlines the processes by which convicted arsonists must register with local law enforcement authorities and the conditions under which such registration can be waived. Key definitions are provided, including the roles of various law enforcement entities and the types of offenses that necessitate registration. The bill is part of a broader effort to enhance public safety by ensuring that individuals with a history of arson are properly monitored.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1191 appears to be largely supportive, particularly amongst law enforcement agencies who highlight the importance of tracking individuals convicted of serious offenses like arson. There is a visible recognition of the need for clear guidelines regarding registration and a commitment to public safety. However, some concerns may arise from civil rights advocates regarding the potential stigmatization and consequences faced by individuals who have served their sentences.

Contention

While the bill has general support, points of contention may arise concerning the balance between public safety and the privacy of individuals who have been convicted of arson. Critics might question whether the registration requirements are overly punitive or if they hinder rehabilitation efforts. Additionally, discussions around the adequacy of the proposed notification methods and their effectiveness in truly protecting communities would likely emerge as relevant topics in ongoing debates about the legislation.