Texas Senate Bill SB1230

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/7/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 3/30/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/5/11
• Refer: 3/16/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 3/30/11
• Voted on by House: 4/26/11
• Engrossed: 4/5/11
• Governor Action: 5/9/11
• Refer: 4/11/11
• Report Pass: 4/20/11
• Enrolled: 4/27/11
• Passed: 5/9/11

Caption

Relating to the construction and operation of combined heating and power facilities in certain municipalities.

Impact

Enactment of SB1230 is expected to significantly alter the landscape of energy management within qualifying municipalities. It would enable local governments to take control of energy production through the establishment of CHP systems, fostering independent energy sources that can stimulate local economies. The bill also empowers municipalities to create designated economic development districts around these energy facilities, potentially attracting industrial customers who require substantial energy resources. This autonomy can lead to improved energy resilience and efficiency for local communities.

Summary

Senate Bill 1230 focuses on the construction and operation of combined heating and power (CHP) facilities within certain municipalities in Texas. Specifically, the bill applies to home-rule municipalities with populations over 100,000, those that own and operate an electric utility and are situated adjacent to large counties. By establishing these provisions, the bill aims to enhance local energy generation capabilities, thereby allowing municipalities to generate and manage their energy resources efficiently. This initiative could provide municipalities with the autonomy to cater to their specific energy demands and contribute to state energy goals.

Contention

Despite its potential benefits, there are concerns regarding SB1230 and its implications for local governance and state regulatory frameworks. Some critics argue that granting municipalities the authority to administer their energy systems could lead to disparities in energy quality and pricing across the state. Furthermore, concerns about the preemption of municipal charters may lead to conflicts between the state regulations and local ordinances. Debates among legislators have also pointed to the necessity of ensuring that local needs and conditions are adequately considered in the establishment of such energy systems.