Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1234 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 10, 2011      TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton Jr., Chair, House Committee on Urban Affairs      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1234 by West (Relating to municipal management districts.), As Engrossed    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Local Government Code regarding rules and regulations governing municipal management districts. The bill would expand the definition of a disadvantaged business to include any person certified as a disadvantaged business by the State or a political subdivision of the State. The bill would specify powers of a district for a road project and a mass transit system. Any act made by a district would be presumed valid after the third anniversary of the effective date unless deemed invalid by a court. A district would not be required to submit bonds that are not public securities to the attorney general for review. A municipality would be authorized to dissolve a district even if the district has outstanding bond indebtedness. A district would be authorized to enter into a strategic partnership agreement with a municipality if the district has territory in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the municipality. The bill would repeal Sections 375.021, 375.027, and 375.064(f) of the Local Government Code. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported the fiscal impact associated with the provisions of the bill is not anticipated to be significant. Local Government Impact There could be a fiscal impact to a district or a municipality associated with the provisions, but the amounts would vary depending on current procedures and the number of strategic partnerships a district entered into with a municipality. The Memorial City District reported that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed within the districts existing resources.    Source Agencies:582 Commission on Environmental Quality   LBB Staff:  JOB, KKR, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 10, 2011





  TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton Jr., Chair, House Committee on Urban Affairs      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1234 by West (Relating to municipal management districts.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton Jr., Chair, House Committee on Urban Affairs
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1234 by West (Relating to municipal management districts.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Harold V. Dutton Jr., Chair, House Committee on Urban Affairs 

 Honorable Harold V. Dutton Jr., Chair, House Committee on Urban Affairs 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB1234 by West (Relating to municipal management districts.), As Engrossed

SB1234 by West (Relating to municipal management districts.), As Engrossed



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Local Government Code regarding rules and regulations governing municipal management districts. The bill would expand the definition of a disadvantaged business to include any person certified as a disadvantaged business by the State or a political subdivision of the State. The bill would specify powers of a district for a road project and a mass transit system. Any act made by a district would be presumed valid after the third anniversary of the effective date unless deemed invalid by a court. A district would not be required to submit bonds that are not public securities to the attorney general for review. A municipality would be authorized to dissolve a district even if the district has outstanding bond indebtedness. A district would be authorized to enter into a strategic partnership agreement with a municipality if the district has territory in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the municipality. The bill would repeal Sections 375.021, 375.027, and 375.064(f) of the Local Government Code. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality reported the fiscal impact associated with the provisions of the bill is not anticipated to be significant.

Local Government Impact

There could be a fiscal impact to a district or a municipality associated with the provisions, but the amounts would vary depending on current procedures and the number of strategic partnerships a district entered into with a municipality. The Memorial City District reported that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed within the districts existing resources.

There could be a fiscal impact to a district or a municipality associated with the provisions, but the amounts would vary depending on current procedures and the number of strategic partnerships a district entered into with a municipality.

The Memorial City District reported that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed within the districts existing resources.

Source Agencies: 582 Commission on Environmental Quality

582 Commission on Environmental Quality

LBB Staff: JOB, KKR, TP

 JOB, KKR, TP