Texas Senate Bill SB1352

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/9/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/4/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/14/11
• Refer: 3/22/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/29/11
• Report Pass: 4/4/11
• Voted on by House: 5/20/11
• Engrossed: 4/14/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 4/28/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the lease of property or hospital facilities by certain hospital districts.

Impact

If enacted, this legislation would significantly alter the operational landscape for certain hospital districts. By removing the need for commissioners court approval, it is expected that hospital boards would be able to act more swiftly and responsively to their specific needs, especially in times of urgency or financial constraints. The potential for faster leasing processes could enhance the districts' ability to manage resources effectively and meet the healthcare needs of their communities. The change may also lead to increased flexibility in negotiating lease terms and conditions, which could be beneficial for hospital funding and capacity issues.

Summary

SB1352 proposes an amendment to the Health and Safety Code, specifically targeting the contracting authority of certain hospital districts regarding the leasing of property or hospital facilities. Under current law, hospital districts must obtain the approval of the commissioners court before entering into any lease agreements. This bill seeks to eliminate that requirement, providing the board of a hospital district the ability to lease properties or facilities independently after a public meeting, thus streamlining the process. The change is designed to facilitate the management and operation of hospital districts by reducing bureaucratic procedures that can delay decision-making.

Contention

While proponents of SB1352 argue that it will promote efficiency and better governance within hospital districts, it may raise concerns regarding oversight and accountability. The current requirement for commissioners court approval serves as a check on the decisions made by hospital boards, ensuring alignment with broader community interests and financial oversight. Critics may fear that removing this requirement could lead to less transparency in the leasing process and potential mismanagement of public resources. Therefore, the debate surrounding this bill is likely to encompass discussions about the balance between operational efficiency and accountability in public health governance.