LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 28, 2011 TO: Honorable Chris Harris, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1476 by Hegar (Relating to the minimum continuing legal education requirements for an attorney employed in the executive branch of state government.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Government Code relating to the minimum continuing legal education requirements for an attorney employed in the executive branch of state government. The bill would require the State Bar to credit an attorney with the Bars minimum continuing legal education requirements for a reporting year if the attorney is employed full-time by a board, commission, department, agency, office, or other entity in the executive branch during the reporting year. An attorney would still be required to meet the Bars continuing legal education requirements in legal ethics or professional responsibility. As written, the change in statute would not apply to continuing legal education requirements until fiscal year 2013. This estimate assumes there could be a positive fiscal impact to the state to the extent state agencies within the executive branch of government pay continuing legal education for their attorney staff. This estimate assumes that not all state agencies of the executive branch pay continuing legal education for attorney staff; accordingly no significant fiscal impact is anticipated. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) currently pays continuing legal education for its attorney staff. The OAG estimates that if enacted the bill would result in a biennial savings to the office of $430,543 ($215,271 per fiscal year). The OAG submitted $430,543 as part of its 10 percent reduction options schedule and those reductions are included in both House Bill 1 and Senate Bill 1. If the bill were not enacted the Office of Attorney General would not be obligated to have to pay continuing legal education for the offices staff. This estimate assumes savings beginning in fiscal year 2013 because as written rules are not altered until fiscal year 2013.The bill would take effect September 1, 2011. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General LBB Staff: JOB, JT, ZS, JP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 28, 2011
TO: Honorable Chris Harris, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1476 by Hegar (Relating to the minimum continuing legal education requirements for an attorney employed in the executive branch of state government.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Chris Harris, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1476 by Hegar (Relating to the minimum continuing legal education requirements for an attorney employed in the executive branch of state government.), As Introduced
Honorable Chris Harris, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
Honorable Chris Harris, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1476 by Hegar (Relating to the minimum continuing legal education requirements for an attorney employed in the executive branch of state government.), As Introduced
SB1476 by Hegar (Relating to the minimum continuing legal education requirements for an attorney employed in the executive branch of state government.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Government Code relating to the minimum continuing legal education requirements for an attorney employed in the executive branch of state government. The bill would require the State Bar to credit an attorney with the Bars minimum continuing legal education requirements for a reporting year if the attorney is employed full-time by a board, commission, department, agency, office, or other entity in the executive branch during the reporting year. An attorney would still be required to meet the Bars continuing legal education requirements in legal ethics or professional responsibility. As written, the change in statute would not apply to continuing legal education requirements until fiscal year 2013. This estimate assumes there could be a positive fiscal impact to the state to the extent state agencies within the executive branch of government pay continuing legal education for their attorney staff. This estimate assumes that not all state agencies of the executive branch pay continuing legal education for attorney staff; accordingly no significant fiscal impact is anticipated. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) currently pays continuing legal education for its attorney staff. The OAG estimates that if enacted the bill would result in a biennial savings to the office of $430,543 ($215,271 per fiscal year). The OAG submitted $430,543 as part of its 10 percent reduction options schedule and those reductions are included in both House Bill 1 and Senate Bill 1. If the bill were not enacted the Office of Attorney General would not be obligated to have to pay continuing legal education for the offices staff. This estimate assumes savings beginning in fiscal year 2013 because as written rules are not altered until fiscal year 2013.The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
The bill would amend the Government Code relating to the minimum continuing legal education requirements for an attorney employed in the executive branch of state government. The bill would require the State Bar to credit an attorney with the Bars minimum continuing legal education requirements for a reporting year if the attorney is employed full-time by a board, commission, department, agency, office, or other entity in the executive branch during the reporting year. An attorney would still be required to meet the Bars continuing legal education requirements in legal ethics or professional responsibility.
As written, the change in statute would not apply to continuing legal education requirements until fiscal year 2013.
This estimate assumes there could be a positive fiscal impact to the state to the extent state agencies within the executive branch of government pay continuing legal education for their attorney staff. This estimate assumes that not all state agencies of the executive branch pay continuing legal education for attorney staff; accordingly no significant fiscal impact is anticipated.
The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) currently pays continuing legal education for its attorney staff. The OAG estimates that if enacted the bill would result in a biennial savings to the office of $430,543 ($215,271 per fiscal year). The OAG submitted $430,543 as part of its 10 percent reduction options schedule and those reductions are included in both House Bill 1 and Senate Bill 1. If the bill were not enacted the Office of Attorney General would not be obligated to have to pay continuing legal education for the offices staff.
This estimate assumes savings beginning in fiscal year 2013 because as written rules are not altered until fiscal year 2013.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General
LBB Staff: JOB, JT, ZS, JP
JOB, JT, ZS, JP