Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1477 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 2, 2011      TO: Honorable Joseph Pickett, Chair, House Committee on Defense & Veterans' Affairs      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1477 by Hegar (Relating to differential pay and benefits for certain officers and employees of emergency services districts who are members of the armed forces.), As Engrossed    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Government Code and Health and Safety Code to authorize the governing body of an emergency services district (ESD) to vote to provide differential pay to an employee who is also a member of the state military forces or a reserve component of the state or federal armed forces. The bill would provide guidelines for the amount of allowable pay. The bill also would authorize an ESD to provide an extension of the employees insurance benefits upon a vote by the governing body that would begin when the benefits allowed under Section 431.005 are exhausted and would continue until the employee's active military duty terminates. Local Government Impact There could be costs associated with increased employee compensation that would vary by district and by the number of qualified employees. It is assumed that an emergency services district would provide differential pay to a qualified employee only if sufficient resources were available or the amounts would not result in a negative fiscal impact to the ESD. Therefore, no significant fiscal implication is anticipated.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, KM    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 2, 2011





  TO: Honorable Joseph Pickett, Chair, House Committee on Defense & Veterans' Affairs      FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1477 by Hegar (Relating to differential pay and benefits for certain officers and employees of emergency services districts who are members of the armed forces.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable Joseph Pickett, Chair, House Committee on Defense & Veterans' Affairs
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1477 by Hegar (Relating to differential pay and benefits for certain officers and employees of emergency services districts who are members of the armed forces.), As Engrossed

 Honorable Joseph Pickett, Chair, House Committee on Defense & Veterans' Affairs 

 Honorable Joseph Pickett, Chair, House Committee on Defense & Veterans' Affairs 

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB1477 by Hegar (Relating to differential pay and benefits for certain officers and employees of emergency services districts who are members of the armed forces.), As Engrossed

SB1477 by Hegar (Relating to differential pay and benefits for certain officers and employees of emergency services districts who are members of the armed forces.), As Engrossed



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Government Code and Health and Safety Code to authorize the governing body of an emergency services district (ESD) to vote to provide differential pay to an employee who is also a member of the state military forces or a reserve component of the state or federal armed forces. The bill would provide guidelines for the amount of allowable pay. The bill also would authorize an ESD to provide an extension of the employees insurance benefits upon a vote by the governing body that would begin when the benefits allowed under Section 431.005 are exhausted and would continue until the employee's active military duty terminates.

Local Government Impact

There could be costs associated with increased employee compensation that would vary by district and by the number of qualified employees. It is assumed that an emergency services district would provide differential pay to a qualified employee only if sufficient resources were available or the amounts would not result in a negative fiscal impact to the ESD. Therefore, no significant fiscal implication is anticipated.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, KM

 JOB, KM