Texas Senate Bill SB1478

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/10/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/18/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/28/11
• Refer: 3/22/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/9/11
• Report Pass: 4/18/11
• Voted on by House: 5/10/11
• Engrossed: 4/28/11
• Governor Action: 5/27/11
• Refer: 4/29/11
• Report Pass: 5/3/11
• Enrolled: 5/11/11
• Passed: 5/27/11

Caption

Relating to deadlines for the Railroad Commission of Texas to review certain applications for surface coal mining operation permits.

Impact

The implementation of SB1478 will significantly change how applicants for coal mining permits interact with the Railroad Commission of Texas. By instituting definitive time frames for the review process, the bill is intended to streamline applications and reduce delays, which could potentially increase the efficiency of permit issuance. This change is aimed at improving clarity and predictability for businesses engaged in coal operations, which may foster a more favorable business environment within the state. However, the revisions stipulate that strict protocols must be adhered to in forwarding applications through various stages of review.

Summary

SB1478 seeks to amend existing provisions in the Natural Resources Code related to the operation of surface coal mining, specifically focusing on the timelines and procedures for the Railroad Commission of Texas to review applications for mining operation permits. The bill introduces more structured deadlines for the commission's review processes, establishing a clear framework for both new permits and permit revisions. Notably, the measure permits the director of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Division to extend review periods under certain conditions but mandates timely communication with applicants regarding their applications' status.

Contention

While proponents of SB1478 argue that establishing clear timelines will enhance regulatory efficiency and support the coal mining industry, critics may voice concerns about the implications for environmental oversight and safety standards. Moreover, some stakeholders might perceive the potential for extended review periods as a loophole that could allow certain applications more time than is necessary, possibly delaying environmental assessments or community input. Thus, the balance between facilitating business operations and protecting public interest remains a pivotal point of discussion regarding the bill's passage.