LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 16, 2011 TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB216 by Ellis (Relating to procedures related to the placement of a voter on the suspense list.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Election Code to allow a voter registrar to remove a voter from a suspense list if the determination is made that a renewal certificate was returned due to a postal service error, address reclassification, or a registrar's clerical error. The bill also would allow an extension of a voter's suspense status based on the event that the person voted after their suspense date and the required change of residence form was not obtained. The bill would require the Secretary of State (SOS) to adopt rules for a uniform and auditable process regarding a voters residence. SOS reported the software would need to be modified to extend a voters suspense status, but the costs could be absorbed using existing resources. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:307 Secretary of State LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 16, 2011
TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB216 by Ellis (Relating to procedures related to the placement of a voter on the suspense list.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB216 by Ellis (Relating to procedures related to the placement of a voter on the suspense list.), As Introduced
Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB216 by Ellis (Relating to procedures related to the placement of a voter on the suspense list.), As Introduced
SB216 by Ellis (Relating to procedures related to the placement of a voter on the suspense list.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Election Code to allow a voter registrar to remove a voter from a suspense list if the determination is made that a renewal certificate was returned due to a postal service error, address reclassification, or a registrar's clerical error. The bill also would allow an extension of a voter's suspense status based on the event that the person voted after their suspense date and the required change of residence form was not obtained. The bill would require the Secretary of State (SOS) to adopt rules for a uniform and auditable process regarding a voters residence. SOS reported the software would need to be modified to extend a voters suspense status, but the costs could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 307 Secretary of State
307 Secretary of State
LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, TP
JOB, KJG, TP