Texas Senate Bill SB227

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Filed: 11/18/10
• Out of Senate Committee: 3/7/11
• Introduced: 11/18/10
• Voted on by Senate: 4/7/11
• Refer: 1/31/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/11/11
• Report Pass: 3/7/11
• Voted on by House: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 4/7/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/28/11
• Enrolled: 5/20/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the nondisciplinary resolution of certain complaints filed against physicians.

Impact

The introduction of SB227 has potential implications for state laws governing medical practices. By shifting some complaints to a nondisciplinary resolution process, the bill may alleviate burdens on the Texas Medical Board, allowing it to focus on more serious complaints that involve patient harm, felonies, or inappropriate behavior. The bill is likely to help physicians address minor infractions without enduring the significant repercussions that come from formal disciplinary actions, thus influencing the professional landscape in Texas by providing more avenues for physicians to rectify issues.

Summary

SB227 is a legislative proposal aimed at introducing non-disciplinary resolutions for certain complaints filed against physicians in Texas. The bill seeks to amend the Occupations Code by adding definitions and procedures for what is termed as a 'remedial plan'. This plan serves as an alternative to traditional disciplinary actions, allowing for certain complaints to be resolved without inflicting penalties such as license revocation or suspension. This approach targets complaints that are deemed less severe and more suited for remediation rather than punishment.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding SB227 may arise around the criteria for which complaints can be resolved through a remedial plan. Critics could argue that this might lead to leniency in managing physician behavior, especially if the bill expands the scope of what is considered non-disciplinary. On the other hand, supporters may advocate that facilitating remediation could enhance patient safety by encouraging physicians to address issues proactively instead of fearing punitive actions. Furthermore, there could be concerns over transparency, as the public access to information regarding agreed dispositions and remedial plans remains a notable aspect of the proposal.