Texas Senate Bill SB252

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/7/11
• Introduced: 12/9/10
• Voted on by Senate: 4/21/11
• Refer: 1/31/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/17/11
• Report Pass: 4/7/11
• Engrossed: 4/21/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 5/6/11
• Report Pass: 5/16/11

Caption

Relating to the management, breeding, and destruction of deer and to procedures regarding certain deer permits.

Impact

The bill has a significant impact on state laws concerning wildlife management. It clarifies the roles of both the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the Animal Health Commission in overseeing deer populations, particularly in regards to potential health risks. The introduction of protocols for the destruction of deer due to disease control further emphasizes the state's commitment to preventing the spread of wildlife diseases, creating a structured approach to managing threats to animal and public health.

Summary

SB252 aims to regulate the management, breeding, and destruction of deer in Texas by amending various sections of the Parks and Wildlife Code. The bill introduces specific procedures for issuing permits related to deer breeding, demonstrating the legislature's focus on maintaining control over animal health and managing deer populations responsibly. Notably, it establishes statutes for the refusal to issue or renew permits based on criminal convictions, ensuring that individuals with relevant misdemeanors or felonies cannot breach established wildlife regulations.

Conclusion

Overall, SB252 represents a comprehensive approach to deer management that balances the interests of wildlife conservation with public safety. By structuring the regulatory framework around deer population control and breeding permits, the bill addresses essential aspects of environmental stewardship while highlighting the need for responsible wildlife management practices in Texas.

Contention

One point of contention is likely to arise from the provisions regarding permit refusals based on the applicant's previous convictions. Supporters argue that such measures are necessary to ensure compliance with wildlife regulations and to protect the ecosystem, while some opponents may see it as an overreach that limits opportunities for those who may have reformed. Additionally, the protocols for deer destruction following an epidemiological assessment may prompt discussions about animal rights and the ethical considerations of wildlife management.