Texas 2011 82nd Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB4 House Committee Report / Bill

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    82R29992 CAE-D
 By: Shapiro S.B. No. 4
 (Eissler)
 Substitute the following for S.B. No. 4:  No.


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to certification, continuing education, and appraisal of
 public school teachers.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Section 21.048, Education Code, is amended by
 adding Subsection (a-1) to read as follows:
 (a-1)  In proposing rules under Subsection (a), the board
 shall prescribe a comprehensive examination administered to a
 person applying for certification to teach early childhood through
 grade four or English as a second language in early childhood
 through grade four that includes components in reading, language
 arts, science, social studies, and mathematics.  The reading
 component must include material covering the science of reading.
 The proposed rules must provide for scoring the examination based
 on a cumulative score in addition to an individual score for each
 component area listed in this subsection. The proposed rules must
 provide a minimum scoring standard that demonstrates satisfactory
 performance and content mastery for the cumulative score and each
 component area. The minimum scoring standard proposed by the board
 for the cumulative score must be greater than the total of the
 proposed minimum scoring standard for each component area.
 SECTION 2.  Section 21.054, Education Code, is amended by
 adding Subsection (b) to read as follows:
 (b)  The board shall implement an appraisal and
 accountability system for continuing education courses offered in
 this state and monitor the quality of all continuing education
 courses.
 SECTION 3.  Section 21.351, Education Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 21.351.  RECOMMENDED APPRAISAL PROCESS AND PERFORMANCE
 CRITERIA. (a) The commissioner shall adopt a recommended
 appraisal process and criteria on which to appraise the performance
 of teachers.  The process adopted must provide for basing a
 significant portion of the appraisal on the teacher's student
 learning objectives and outcomes, which must include student
 performance on assessment instruments administered under Section
 39.023 and other student learning objectives and outcomes.  The
 performance of a teacher's students on assessment instruments
 required under Subchapter B, Chapter 39, may not be the primary
 indicator for determining teacher effectiveness.  The recommended
 appraisal process must provide a method for determining the
 effectiveness of teachers who do not teach a subject in which
 assessment instruments under Subchapter B, Chapter 39, are
 administered.  [The criteria must be based on observable,
 job-related behavior, including:
 [(1)     teachers' implementation of discipline
 management procedures; and
 [(2)  the performance of teachers' students.]
 (b)  The commissioner shall solicit and consider the advice
 of teachers, administrative leaders, education experts, and
 parents of students in developing the recommended appraisal process
 and performance criteria.
 (c)  Under the recommended appraisal process, an appraiser
 must be the teacher's supervisor or a person approved by the board
 of trustees and be monitored as necessary to ensure fairness,
 thoroughness, and accuracy of the system. An appraiser who is a
 classroom teacher may not appraise the performance of another
 classroom teacher who teaches at the same school campus at which the
 appraiser teaches, unless it is impractical because of the number
 of campuses or unless the appraiser is the chair of a department or
 grade level whose job description includes classroom observation
 responsibilities.
 (d)  The recommended appraisal process for teachers must
 provide that:
 (1)  a teacher be appraised at least once each school
 year;
 (2)  consistent and clear expectations regarding
 teacher performance be communicated to the teacher at least once
 each year;
 (3)  a self-evaluation be completed by the teacher and
 be considered by the appraiser before the teacher's appraisal is
 complete; and
 (4)  a teacher's overall performance, based on the
 appraisal, be assigned one of five ratings, as applicable, though a
 greater number of separate ratings may be used to detail
 performance under each [Under the recommended appraisal process,
 appraisal for teachers must be detailed by] category of
 professional skill and characteristic appraised as part of the
 appraisal of the teacher's overall performance [and must provide
 for separate ratings for each category].
 (e)  The recommended appraisal process for teachers must
 [shall] guarantee that a conference between the teacher and the
 appraiser will occur as soon as possible after the teacher's
 appraisal under this section is completed. The conference must
 [shall] be diagnostic and prescriptive with regard to remediation
 needed in overall performance and by category.
 (f)  The recommended appraisal process may provide a
 modified and less frequent appraisal process for a teacher if the
 most recent appraisal of the teacher rated the teacher at the
 highest level of proficiency in the system and did not identify any
 area of deficiency and the teacher agrees in writing to the modified
 appraisal process. A teacher who is appraised less frequently than
 annually must be appraised at least once during each period of three
 school years.
 (g)  Before the commissioner adopts the recommended
 appraisal process required by this section, the commissioner must
 develop, validate, and test proposals regarding the process.  The
 commissioner may initiate pilot projects to implement and test
 proposals, which may address different aspects of the process and
 different methods for determining teacher effectiveness.  The
 process adopted by the commissioner must include the measurement of
 the teacher's effectiveness. In determining the measurement of the
 teacher's effectiveness, the process adopted must be fair,
 transparent, timely, rigorous, and valid.
 SECTION 4.  Sections 21.352(a) and (c), Education Code, are
 amended to read as follows:
 (a)  In appraising teachers, each school district shall use:
 (1)  the appraisal process and performance criteria
 developed by the commissioner under Section 21.351; or
 (2)  an appraisal process and performance criteria:
 (A)  developed by the district- and campus-level
 committees established under Section 11.251;
 (B)  containing the items described by Sections
 21.351(a) and (d) [21.351(a)(1) and (2)]; and
 (C)  adopted by the board of trustees.
 (c)  Except as otherwise provided by this subsection,
 appraisal must be done at least once during each school year. A
 teacher may be appraised less frequently if the teacher agrees in
 writing and the teacher's most recent evaluation rated the teacher
 at the highest proficiency [as at least proficient, or the
 equivalent,] and did not identify any area of deficiency. A teacher
 who is appraised less frequently than annually must be appraised at
 least once during each period of three [five] school years. The
 district shall maintain a written copy of the evaluation of each
 teacher's performance in the teacher's personnel file. Each
 teacher is entitled to receive a written copy of the evaluation on
 its completion. After receiving a written copy of the evaluation, a
 teacher is entitled to a second appraisal by a different appraiser
 or to submit a written rebuttal to the evaluation to be attached to
 the evaluation in the teacher's personnel file. The evaluation and
 any rebuttal may be given to another school district at which the
 teacher has applied for employment at the request of that district.
 SECTION 5.  Subchapter H, Chapter 21, Education Code, is
 amended by adding Section 21.358 to read as follows:
 Sec. 21.358.  QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISERS. The
 commissioner shall adopt rules regarding the minimum
 qualifications necessary for a person who conducts teacher
 appraisals. The rules must require that the appraiser be highly
 qualified to assess instructional quality and demonstrate
 instructional leadership.
 SECTION 6.  The commissioner of education shall adopt a
 recommended appraisal process that complies with Section 21.351,
 Education Code, as amended by this Act, in a manner that allows a
 school district to implement the recommended appraisal process
 adopted by the commissioner not later than September 1, 2015.
 SECTION 7.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2011.