Texas Senate Bill SB448

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 1/31/11
• Refer: 2/2/11

Caption

Relating to the amount of the permit fee for an on-site sewage disposal system.

Impact

The implementation of SB448 is expected to have significant implications for the regulatory framework governing on-site sewage disposal systems. By limiting fee amounts, the legislation is likely intended to enhance affordability and accessibility for individuals needing permits, reflecting a concern for public health and environmental standards. It also underscores the importance of regulatory uniformity, as local jurisdictions must adhere to these guidelines in their fee structures. This may ultimately inform broader environmental policies by ensuring that permit costs do not serve as a barrier to compliance with health and safety regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 448, introduced by Senator Hegar, focuses on the amount of the permit fee for on-site sewage disposal systems. The bill amends Section 366.058 of the Texas Health and Safety Code and introduces a provision that restricts the fees set by authorized agents. Specifically, these fees cannot exceed the amounts for similar permits issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. This aims to establish consistency in permitting costs across the state while allowing for local delegations of authority regarding permitting processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB448 appears generally positive among supporters who prioritize lowering costs and making it easier for residents and property owners to comply with environmental regulations. Advocates argue that the provisions will protect public health without imposing excessive financial burdens. However, there may be concerns from some local officials who feel that the cap on fees limits their ability to manage sewage systems effectively or address unique local conditions that may necessitate higher fees for certain circumstances.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between state regulation and local authority. Some legislators may argue for stricter oversight and higher fees based on conditions unique to their jurisdictions, particularly in densely populated or environmentally sensitive areas. Additionally, the delegation of permitting authority to local agents raises questions about consistency in application and enforcement of regulations. Thus, SB448 could become a focal point for discussions about the appropriate role of state intervention in local governance and the potential consequences for public health and safety.