Texas Senate Bill SB464

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 1/31/11
• Refer: 2/14/11

Caption

Relating to tracking peace officer membership in the Teacher Retirement System of Texas.

Impact

If enacted, SB464 will enhance the reporting and transparency within the Teacher Retirement System, specifically relating to peace officers. This could lead to improved resource allocation and policy-making that considers the unique status of peace officers in educational environments. The act takes effect on September 1, 2011, and will apply starting with the 2011-2012 school year, which indicates a timely need to bolster the retirement benefits of members employed in a critical role as peace officers.

Summary

SB464 addresses the need for the Teacher Retirement System of Texas to maintain accurate and specific records concerning peace officer membership. The bill mandates that the retirement system identify the positions held by its members and requires additional categorization for those classified as peace officers. This includes differentiating whether these officers work at institutions of higher education or public schools not classified as higher education institutions. This tracking is aimed at better data collection for retirement contributions and benefits related to peace officers in the educational sector.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB464 appears to be generally supportive among those who recognize the importance of providing adequate retirement support for peace officers. Those advocating for the bill argue that ensuring proper tracking of peace officers within the retirement system is essential for their welfare and acknowledges their service in educational communities. Such measures are viewed as critical in retaining and adequately supporting law enforcement personnel embedded in educational institutions.

Contention

While there does not appear to be significant opposition noted in the available discussions about SB464, potential points of contention might arise regarding how these tracking measures could impact funding allocations or the perception of peace officers within the educational system. Critics could raise concerns regarding privacy issues related to such detailed tracking or the implications of categorizing peace officers differently from other educational staff.