LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 30, 2011 TO: Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB53 by Zaffirini (Relating to public school accountability for bilingual education and English as a second language and other special language programs.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB53, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($1,765,300) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 30, 2011
TO: Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on Education FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB53 by Zaffirini (Relating to public school accountability for bilingual education and English as a second language and other special language programs.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB53 by Zaffirini (Relating to public school accountability for bilingual education and English as a second language and other special language programs.), As Introduced
Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on Education
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB53 by Zaffirini (Relating to public school accountability for bilingual education and English as a second language and other special language programs.), As Introduced
SB53 by Zaffirini (Relating to public school accountability for bilingual education and English as a second language and other special language programs.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB53, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($1,765,300) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB53, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($1,765,300) through the biennium ending August 31, 2013.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2012 ($781,561) 2013 ($983,739) 2014 ($959,739) 2015 ($1,174,112) 2016 ($1,150,112)
2012 ($781,561)
2013 ($983,739)
2014 ($959,739)
2015 ($1,174,112)
2016 ($1,150,112)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009 2012 ($781,561) 9.0 2013 ($983,739) 12.0 2014 ($959,739) 12.0 2015 ($1,174,112) 14.5 2016 ($1,150,112) 14.5
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009 2012 ($781,561) 9.0 2013 ($983,739) 12.0 2014 ($959,739) 12.0 2015 ($1,174,112) 14.5 2016 ($1,150,112) 14.5
2012 ($781,561) 9.0
2013 ($983,739) 12.0
2014 ($959,739) 12.0
2015 ($1,174,112) 14.5
2016 ($1,150,112) 14.5
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would require the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to disaggregate academic excellence indicators for bilingual and English as a Second Language (special language programs) at the school district, campus, and open-enrollment charter school level and would create additional indicators. The bill would require that lead monitors of bilingual and special language programs be certified for bilingual education, English as a Second Language, or other special language programs. TEA would be required to notify school districts or charter schools of a campus that is non-compliant with respect to bilingual or special language programs in writing within 30 days after an intervention begins. The bill specifies areas that school districts and charter schools would be required to review in response to notification of intervention. The bill would require TEA to review annual improvement in bilingual or special language programs in relation to annual improvement goals set by the school district or charter school.
The bill would require the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to disaggregate academic excellence indicators for bilingual and English as a Second Language (special language programs) at the school district, campus, and open-enrollment charter school level and would create additional indicators.
The bill would require that lead monitors of bilingual and special language programs be certified for bilingual education, English as a Second Language, or other special language programs.
TEA would be required to notify school districts or charter schools of a campus that is non-compliant with respect to bilingual or special language programs in writing within 30 days after an intervention begins. The bill specifies areas that school districts and charter schools would be required to review in response to notification of intervention.
The bill would require TEA to review annual improvement in bilingual or special language programs in relation to annual improvement goals set by the school district or charter school.
Methodology
It is estimated that the provisions of the bill would require 8.0 additional FTEs in the Performance Based Monitoring division of TEA at a cost of $708,663 in FY2012 and $644,663 in each subsequent year, inclusive of salary, benefits, and other expenses. It is estimated that the provisions of bill would result in additional on-site monitoring visits, which would require 1.0 FTE in FY2012 at a cost of $72,897, 4.0 FTEs in FY2013 and FY2014 at a cost of $327,576 in FY2013 and $303,576 in FY2014, and 6.5 FTEs in FY2015 and FY2016 at a cost of $512,949 in FY2015 and $488,949 in FY2016. All FTE costs are inclusive of salary, benefits, and other expenses. Travel expenses are estimated at $10,000 annually in FY2013 and FY2014 and $15,000 annually in FY2015 and FY2016. Costs for training and certification of monitors to comply with the provisions of the bill are estimated at $1,500 per year beginning in FY2013.
It is estimated that the provisions of the bill would require 8.0 additional FTEs in the Performance Based Monitoring division of TEA at a cost of $708,663 in FY2012 and $644,663 in each subsequent year, inclusive of salary, benefits, and other expenses.
It is estimated that the provisions of bill would result in additional on-site monitoring visits, which would require 1.0 FTE in FY2012 at a cost of $72,897, 4.0 FTEs in FY2013 and FY2014 at a cost of $327,576 in FY2013 and $303,576 in FY2014, and 6.5 FTEs in FY2015 and FY2016 at a cost of $512,949 in FY2015 and $488,949 in FY2016. All FTE costs are inclusive of salary, benefits, and other expenses. Travel expenses are estimated at $10,000 annually in FY2013 and FY2014 and $15,000 annually in FY2015 and FY2016.
Costs for training and certification of monitors to comply with the provisions of the bill are estimated at $1,500 per year beginning in FY2013.
Local Government Impact
School districts and open-enrollment charter schools might incur additional costs related to interventions if programs were found to be ineffective or related to corrective actions if the districts or schools failed to meet one or more annual improvement goals.
School districts and open-enrollment charter schools might incur additional costs related to interventions if programs were found to be ineffective or related to corrective actions if the districts or schools failed to meet one or more annual improvement goals.
Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency
701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: JOB, LXH, JGM, JSc
JOB, LXH, JGM, JSc