Texas Senate Bill SB552

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/8/11
• Refer: 3/17/11

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Energy Efficiency Coordination Council and to statewide energy efficiency; providing penalties.

Impact

The bill is poised to significantly influence how energy efficiency is managed and regulated at the state level. By centralizing this function under the Energy Efficiency Coordination Council, the bill encourages collaboration among state agencies, utility providers, and energy efficiency service providers. It aims for a cohesive approach to energy management that promotes both environmental objectives and economic efficiency. However, the potential for increased state oversight may raise questions about the balance between regulation and market-driven initiatives in energy sectors.

Summary

SB552 proposes the establishment of the Energy Efficiency Coordination Council in Texas, aiming to enhance energy efficiency across various sectors. The council's primary purpose is to study and create standardized methods for energy efficiency programs, including standardized contracts and reporting methods. Furthermore, it will ensure that energy efficiency efforts align with state goals while facilitating transparency and public interaction, including the development of a public Internet website for accessibility to information related to energy efficiency programs.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB552 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Supporters advocate for the enhanced coordination it promises, suggesting that standardized practices will yield better energy savings and program efficiencies. Nonetheless, there may be concerns about bureaucratic inefficiencies or potential conflicts of interests within the council, particularly regarding appointments and compliance mandates among utility providers and service contractors.

Contention

A notable point of contention could arise from the civil penalties enforced for non-submission of required data by utility providers and energy efficiency service providers. Critics may argue that such penalties could impose undue financial burdens on smaller entities operating in the energy sector. Furthermore, the obligation for state agencies to consider the council’s recommendations could be viewed as excessive regulation that stifles innovation and flexibility in addressing energy efficiency on local levels.