Texas Senate Bill SB613

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/11/11
• Introduced: 2/11/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/21/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/10/11
• Report Pass: 4/11/11
• Voted on by House: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 4/21/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 5/6/11
• Enrolled: 5/20/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to educational requirements for licensing as a speech-language pathologist or audiologist.

Impact

The implementation of SB613 could have significant implications for the practices of both speech-language pathologists and audiologists in the state. By tightening the educational credentials required for licensure, the bill aims to enhance the quality of services provided to individuals with communication disorders. Furthermore, the stricter criteria may also help align Texas with national standards, making it easier for graduates from recognized programs to establish their practices in the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 613 seeks to amend the educational requirements necessary for individuals seeking licensing as speech-language pathologists and audiologists in Texas. The bill stipulates that applicants for a speech-language pathology license must possess at least a master's degree in communicative sciences or disorders from an accredited institution, while those applying for an audiology license must have a doctoral degree in audiology or a related field. This legislative change aims to ensure that professionals in these fields have a standardized educational foundation, which is critical for maintaining high standards of practice within Texas.

Contention

One notable aspect of SB613 is the potential debate among stakeholders regarding the accessibility of graduate education for aspiring professionals. Critics may argue that increasing the educational requirements could restrict entry into these fields, particularly affecting those from underrepresented backgrounds or communities with limited access to advanced education. Proponents, however, may contend that raising educational standards is essential for safeguarding the integrity and effectiveness of services provided to clients, thus justifying the adjustments to licensing requirements.