Texas Senate Bill SB680

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/24/11
• Introduced: 2/14/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/7/11
• Refer: 2/23/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/27/11
• Report Pass: 3/24/11
• Engrossed: 4/7/11
• Refer: 4/11/11
• Report Pass: 4/20/11

Caption

Relating to a fee collected by a district clerk for certain certified copies.

Impact

By amending the fee structures, SB680 is expected to create a more predictable and efficient system for both clerks and the public who access these records. This could lead to enhanced transparency and improved service as clerks work within a clearer framework of what fees can be charged. However, there may also be impacts on individuals and attorneys who rely on these services, adjusting to any changes in the fees that could affect their costs when filing documents or accessing records through district clerks.

Summary

SB680 addresses the fees that district clerks in Texas are authorized to collect for certain certified copies of documents. The main focus of the bill is to amend the existing Government Code to clarify and potentially adjust the fee structure associated with various legal processes, including the issuance of subpoenas, citations, and the provision of certified copies of records. The bill aims to streamline the existing fee structure to enhance the efficiency of the district clerks' offices while also ensuring that the fees are reasonable and uniform across different processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, SB680 is aimed at refining the current regulations concerning district clerk fees, potentially impacting various stakeholders in the process. The outcomes of this bill will depend on the discourse surrounding its provisions, especially regarding cost implications for citizens and the service efficiency of the district clerk's offices.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB680 could revolve around the potential increase or decrease in fees, which may impact access to legal documents for individuals who may be financially constrained. Advocacy groups may raise concerns over the affordability of accessing the judiciary system when fees change, arguing that any increase in fees could serve as a barrier to justice. Conversely, district clerks may support the bill if it leads to a more sustainable funding method for their operations.