LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 14, 2011 TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB687 by Huffman (Relating to interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a sheriffs department in a county with a population of 3.3 million or more or a police department in a municipality with a population of 500,000 or more to engage in the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication pursuant to current guidelines governing such practices. The bill would provide for an application process to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) for a local entity interested in engaging in these practices. DPS would have the authority to audit a designated law enforcement agency to ensure compliance with monitoring guidelines. Any peace officer engaged in operating or monitoring the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication would be required to complete training regarding interception of communications. This analysis assumes DPS could implement the provisions of the bill within existing appropriations. The bill would clarify several definitions in Article 18.20, including the initial period of interception and who qualifies as a prosecutor or director. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011. Local Government Impact There would be costs associated with starting a program and training peace officers, but it is assumed that a municipality or a county would implement the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication only if there were sufficient resources available or the net fiscal impact would be positive. According to the Houston Police Department (HPD), any costs associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed using existing resources. HPD indicated the use of intercepts could result in significant savings in manpower and resources. HPD also stated the use of intercepts could greatly aid in dismantling major criminal organizations, and that seized assets from these organizations could offset much of the operating expenses of an intercept program. Source Agencies:405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TP
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 14, 2011
TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB687 by Huffman (Relating to interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB687 by Huffman (Relating to interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB687 by Huffman (Relating to interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
SB687 by Huffman (Relating to interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a sheriffs department in a county with a population of 3.3 million or more or a police department in a municipality with a population of 500,000 or more to engage in the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication pursuant to current guidelines governing such practices. The bill would provide for an application process to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) for a local entity interested in engaging in these practices. DPS would have the authority to audit a designated law enforcement agency to ensure compliance with monitoring guidelines. Any peace officer engaged in operating or monitoring the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication would be required to complete training regarding interception of communications. This analysis assumes DPS could implement the provisions of the bill within existing appropriations. The bill would clarify several definitions in Article 18.20, including the initial period of interception and who qualifies as a prosecutor or director. The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a sheriffs department in a county with a population of 3.3 million or more or a police department in a municipality with a population of 500,000 or more to engage in the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication pursuant to current guidelines governing such practices. The bill would provide for an application process to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) for a local entity interested in engaging in these practices. DPS would have the authority to audit a designated law enforcement agency to ensure compliance with monitoring guidelines. Any peace officer engaged in operating or monitoring the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication would be required to complete training regarding interception of communications. This analysis assumes DPS could implement the provisions of the bill within existing appropriations. The bill would clarify several definitions in Article 18.20, including the initial period of interception and who qualifies as a prosecutor or director.
The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.
Local Government Impact
There would be costs associated with starting a program and training peace officers, but it is assumed that a municipality or a county would implement the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication only if there were sufficient resources available or the net fiscal impact would be positive. According to the Houston Police Department (HPD), any costs associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed using existing resources. HPD indicated the use of intercepts could result in significant savings in manpower and resources. HPD also stated the use of intercepts could greatly aid in dismantling major criminal organizations, and that seized assets from these organizations could offset much of the operating expenses of an intercept program.
There would be costs associated with starting a program and training peace officers, but it is assumed that a municipality or a county would implement the interception of a wire, oral or electronic communication only if there were sufficient resources available or the net fiscal impact would be positive.
According to the Houston Police Department (HPD), any costs associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed using existing resources. HPD indicated the use of intercepts could result in significant savings in manpower and resources. HPD also stated the use of intercepts could greatly aid in dismantling major criminal organizations, and that seized assets from these organizations could offset much of the operating expenses of an intercept program.
Source Agencies: 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education
405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TP
JOB, ESi, TP