Texas Senate Bill SB795

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/28/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/7/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/10/11
• Voted on by House: 5/20/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to regulation of nurse aides.

Impact

The proposed legislation will significantly affect the operation of the nurse aide registry in Texas. Under the new provisions, listed nurse aides must maintain their status through periodic renewal, which requires completion of at least 24 hours of in-service education every two years. This includes training specifically in geriatrics and care for patients with Alzheimer's disease, thus ensuring that nurse aides remain current with the skills necessary to address the evolving needs of the populations they serve. The changes could elevate the overall standards of care in nursing facilities and other healthcare settings, as the competency of aides becomes a focal point.

Summary

Senate Bill 795, titled 'Relating to regulation of nurse aides', seeks to amend the Health and Safety Code to impose new educational and training standards for individuals wishing to be listed as nurse aides. The bill mandates that applicants complete a training program comprising at least 100 hours of coursework and successfully pass a competency evaluation prior to their inclusion on the nurse aide registry. This regulation aims to enhance the qualifications of nurse aides, thereby improving care delivery in the state’s healthcare environment.

Contention

While SB795 is positioned as a beneficial measure for enhancing healthcare standards, it may face opposition on grounds of accessibility and cost. Concerns may arise regarding the feasibility for current aides to meet the training and education requirements within the established timeframes, potentially leading to workforce shortages in the short term. Some stakeholders might argue that while increasing training standards is essential, the imposition of such regulations could disproportionately affect those already working in the field, causing financial strain or limiting their continued employment. The balance between raising competency and ensuring a stable workforce remains a potential point of debate.