Texas Senate Bill SB82

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/28/11
• Introduced: 11/8/10
• Voted on by Senate: 4/7/11
• Refer: 1/31/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/9/11
• Report Pass: 3/28/11
• Voted on by House: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 4/7/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/28/11
• Report Pass: 5/7/11
• Enrolled: 5/20/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the prosecution of the offense of stalking.

Impact

The bill's enactment would strengthen the legal framework for prosecuting stalking cases in Texas. One of its noteworthy provisions allows for prosecution in any county where any aspect of the crime occurred, which could lead to a more accessible legal process for victims. Additionally, it will facilitate the introduction of evidence concerning previous relationship dynamics between the accused and the victim, which can aid in substantiating stalking claims. This change is particularly significant in addressing the nuances of interpersonal relationships that may contribute to stalking behaviors.

Summary

SB82 proposes significant amendments to the Texas Penal Code regarding the prosecution of stalking offenses. It outlines a clearer definition of stalking, emphasizing the importance of a repeated course of conduct directed at an individual that is perceived as threatening. The bill establishes specific criteria that lead to a stalking charge, making the prosecution process more straightforward and focused on the victim's perspective. It highlights the emotional and psychological impact on the victims, allowing for a broader interpretation of what constitutes stalking behavior and consequently enhancing protections for those affected.

Contention

While supporters argue that these changes are essential for better victim protection and empowerment in the judicial process, opponents may raise concerns about the implications these provisions could have on individuals accused of stalking, particularly regarding the burden of proof and the potential for misinterpretation of behaviors. Additionally, there may be discussions on how this bill aligns with existing privacy laws and the balance necessary to protect both victims and the rights of the accused. Stakeholders would need to carefully navigate these concerns as the discussions evolve around implementation of the bill.