Texas Senate Bill SB959

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 3/28/11
• Introduced: 2/25/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/7/11
• Refer: 3/8/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/12/11
• Report Pass: 3/28/11
• Voted on by House: 5/23/11
• Engrossed: 4/7/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/29/11
• Report Pass: 5/11/11
• Enrolled: 5/23/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to toll collection and enforcement.

Impact

The passage of SB959 is expected to enhance the efficiency of toll collection processes, potentially increasing revenue from tolls by reducing the instances of unpaid tolls. With the implementation of automated enforcement technology, the Texas Transportation Department will have the authority to track and bill registered owners for nonpayment. By shifting the toll payment process to a post-usage model, the bill addresses concerns regarding immediate cash flow at toll booths and may alleviate congestion at toll facilities. Moreover, provisions allowing refunds for closed electronic toll accounts indicate a more consumer-friendly approach.

Summary

SB959, an act relating to toll collection and enforcement, seeks to modify existing laws surrounding toll payments and enforcement mechanisms within the State of Texas. It introduces provisions that allow for the use of video billing and automated enforcement technology for toll collection. This means that registered vehicle owners will be able to receive notices of tolls due after using toll facilities, rather than having to pay upfront. The bill provides specific guidelines on how notices of nonpayment will be processed and communicated to vehicle owners, including mailing requirements and timelines for payments.

Contention

As with many legislative changes, there are points of contention surrounding SB959. Critics might argue that reliance on automated enforcement raises privacy concerns about the tracking of vehicle movements and could lead to an increased financial burden on individuals who may not promptly manage their accounts or notice postal communications. Additionally, the administrative fees imposed for nonpayment pose another potential issue; while capped at $100, these fees can accumulate quickly, leading to significant expenses for individuals failing to pay in a timely manner. The bill's provisions may face opposition from those advocating for consumer protection and transparency in fee structures.