LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 5, 2011 TO: Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB980 by Carona (Relating to communications services and markets.), As Passed 2nd House No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Utilities Code to prohibit a state agency from imposing any rule or regulation on Voice over Internet Protocol services or other Internet Protocol Services. The bill would prohibit the Public Utility Commission (PUC) from requiring a telecommunications utility that is not a public utility to comply with a requirement or standard that is more burdensome than what is imposed on a public utility. The bill would eliminate tariff filing requirements for certain telecommunications providers. The bill also prohibits the PUC from ordering a telecommunications provider to provide mandatory or optional extended area service to additional metropolitan areas or calling areas, and prohibits the PUC from ordering an expansion of toll free local calling areas. The bill would establish that a market that is deregulated as of September 1, 2011 is required to remain deregulated. The bill would authorize and incumbent local exchange provider to petition the PUC to deregulate a market that the PUC previously determined should remain regulated. The bill requires that the PUCs rules for the administration of the Universal Service Fund must include procedures to ensure reasonable transparency and accountability in the administration of the fund. The bill establishes that incumbent local exchange companies are prohibited from receiving support from the Universal Service Fund for deregulated markets except in limited circumstances. The bill requires the PUC to initiate proceedings to review and evaluate the Universal Service Fund for necessary changes. The bill would require the PUC to adopt rules to implement the provisions of the bill. Based on the analysis of the Public Utility Commission it is assumed duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:473 Public Utility Commission of Texas LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, MW, RAN, AG, KKR
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 5, 2011
TO: Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB980 by Carona (Relating to communications services and markets.), As Passed 2nd House
TO: Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
FROM: John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB980 by Carona (Relating to communications services and markets.), As Passed 2nd House
Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB980 by Carona (Relating to communications services and markets.), As Passed 2nd House
SB980 by Carona (Relating to communications services and markets.), As Passed 2nd House
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Utilities Code to prohibit a state agency from imposing any rule or regulation on Voice over Internet Protocol services or other Internet Protocol Services. The bill would prohibit the Public Utility Commission (PUC) from requiring a telecommunications utility that is not a public utility to comply with a requirement or standard that is more burdensome than what is imposed on a public utility. The bill would eliminate tariff filing requirements for certain telecommunications providers. The bill also prohibits the PUC from ordering a telecommunications provider to provide mandatory or optional extended area service to additional metropolitan areas or calling areas, and prohibits the PUC from ordering an expansion of toll free local calling areas. The bill would establish that a market that is deregulated as of September 1, 2011 is required to remain deregulated. The bill would authorize and incumbent local exchange provider to petition the PUC to deregulate a market that the PUC previously determined should remain regulated. The bill requires that the PUCs rules for the administration of the Universal Service Fund must include procedures to ensure reasonable transparency and accountability in the administration of the fund. The bill establishes that incumbent local exchange companies are prohibited from receiving support from the Universal Service Fund for deregulated markets except in limited circumstances. The bill requires the PUC to initiate proceedings to review and evaluate the Universal Service Fund for necessary changes. The bill would require the PUC to adopt rules to implement the provisions of the bill. Based on the analysis of the Public Utility Commission it is assumed duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 473 Public Utility Commission of Texas
473 Public Utility Commission of Texas
LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, MW, RAN, AG, KKR
JOB, KJG, MW, RAN, AG, KKR