Texas Senate Bill SJR27

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/21/11
• Refer: 3/1/11

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment concerning the limitation on the rate of growth of state appropriations and the use of unencumbered surplus state revenues to provide for a rebate of state franchise taxes, to reduce public school district property taxes, and to fund the state's rainy day fund.

Impact

The implications of SJR27 for state laws are significant. It modifies existing provisions regarding how state appropriations are calculated and introduces a structured approach for managing surplus revenues, directing them towards rebates and tax relief efforts. This could lead to lower taxes for businesses and individuals during fiscal surplus periods. It aims to balance the state budget more effectively while ensuring that unspent revenues are utilized to alleviate tax burdens on residents and improve fiscal prudence.

Summary

SJR27 proposes a constitutional amendment that aims to limit the rate of growth of state appropriations to a level that reflects the estimated changes in state population and inflation. Additionally, it outlines the use of surplus state revenues for key purposes, including providing rebates for state franchise taxes, reducing local public school district property taxes, and adding funds to the state's rainy day fund. The bill thus seeks to impose tighter constraints on state spending while potentially redistributing some fiscal benefits back to taxpayers and enhancing state reserve funds during economic fluctuations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR27 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who view it as a necessary reform to ensure fiscal responsibility in state budgeting and tax management. Proponents argue that it allows for greater taxpayer benefits and promotes financial stability for the state. However, there are concerns among opponents who fear this may lead to funding cuts for public services if state revenues fall short, raising apprehensions about the adequacy of public education funding and other essential services.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the concerns voiced by critics regarding the potential long-term impacts of constraining state appropriations growth. Critics argue that while the intention behind SJR27 is to create a more predictable fiscal environment, it might inadvertently lead to insufficient funding for critical services like education and infrastructure. The fear is that in times of economic downturn, the rigidity in state appropriation growth could hinder the state's ability to respond dynamically to fiscal challenges and maintain necessary public services.