Texas 2013 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1015 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 8, 2013      TO: Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1015 by Guillen (Relating to the regulation of big cats and nonhuman primates; providing penalties.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Health and Safety Code to prohibit a municipality from adopting an ordinance or order pertaining to big cats or nonhuman primates that is inconsistent with Subchapter F. The bill would add Subchapter F to Chapter 822 of the Health and Safety Code to provide definitions, regulation requirements and exceptions regarding big cats and nonhuman primates in municipalities and counties with a population of 75,000 or more. The bill would create a civil penalty for a person who owns, possesses, or has custody or control; or allows a member of the public to come in direct contact with a big cat or nonhuman primate punishable by a fine of not less than $200 and not more than $2,000. An offense under Section 822.153 would be a Class A misdemeanor. A Class A misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $4,000, confinement in jail for a term not to exceed one year, or both. According to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, no fiscal impact to the agency is anticipated. Local Government Impact There could be significant costs to a municipality or a county related to the enforcement, seizure and impoundment of a big cat or a nonhuman primate; however, the amounts would vary depending on the number of violations; the costs to transport; the costs and duration of impoundment; and associated legal expenses. In addition, a municipality or a county could recover reasonable costs incurred for an investigation, including attorneys and expert witness fees that would be credited to the animal control authoritys operating account. Costs associated with enforcement, prosecution and confinement could likely be absorbed within existing resources; and revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication. According to the City of Houston, no fiscal impact is anticipated.    Source Agencies:802 Parks and Wildlife Department   LBB Staff:  UP, KJo, TP    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 8, 2013





  TO: Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1015 by Guillen (Relating to the regulation of big cats and nonhuman primates; providing penalties.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1015 by Guillen (Relating to the regulation of big cats and nonhuman primates; providing penalties.), As Introduced

 Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism 

 Honorable Ryan Guillen, Chair, House Committee On Culture, Recreation & Tourism 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1015 by Guillen (Relating to the regulation of big cats and nonhuman primates; providing penalties.), As Introduced

HB1015 by Guillen (Relating to the regulation of big cats and nonhuman primates; providing penalties.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Health and Safety Code to prohibit a municipality from adopting an ordinance or order pertaining to big cats or nonhuman primates that is inconsistent with Subchapter F. The bill would add Subchapter F to Chapter 822 of the Health and Safety Code to provide definitions, regulation requirements and exceptions regarding big cats and nonhuman primates in municipalities and counties with a population of 75,000 or more. The bill would create a civil penalty for a person who owns, possesses, or has custody or control; or allows a member of the public to come in direct contact with a big cat or nonhuman primate punishable by a fine of not less than $200 and not more than $2,000. An offense under Section 822.153 would be a Class A misdemeanor. A Class A misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $4,000, confinement in jail for a term not to exceed one year, or both. According to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, no fiscal impact to the agency is anticipated.

Local Government Impact

There could be significant costs to a municipality or a county related to the enforcement, seizure and impoundment of a big cat or a nonhuman primate; however, the amounts would vary depending on the number of violations; the costs to transport; the costs and duration of impoundment; and associated legal expenses. In addition, a municipality or a county could recover reasonable costs incurred for an investigation, including attorneys and expert witness fees that would be credited to the animal control authoritys operating account. Costs associated with enforcement, prosecution and confinement could likely be absorbed within existing resources; and revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication. According to the City of Houston, no fiscal impact is anticipated.

There could be significant costs to a municipality or a county related to the enforcement, seizure and impoundment of a big cat or a nonhuman primate; however, the amounts would vary depending on the number of violations; the costs to transport; the costs and duration of impoundment; and associated legal expenses. In addition, a municipality or a county could recover reasonable costs incurred for an investigation, including attorneys and expert witness fees that would be credited to the animal control authoritys operating account. Costs associated with enforcement, prosecution and confinement could likely be absorbed within existing resources; and revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication.

According to the City of Houston, no fiscal impact is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 802 Parks and Wildlife Department

802 Parks and Wildlife Department

LBB Staff: UP, KJo, TP

 UP, KJo, TP