Texas House Bill HB1267

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to certain Medicaid home and community-based services waiver programs.

Impact

The implications of HB 1267 are significant for state healthcare laws and the provision of services to medically fragile individuals. By mandating a hospital-level care waiver program, this legislation is set to expand the range of covered services for individuals with intensive medical needs. This includes advanced supportive services, personal care, skilled nursing, and various therapies, which could potentially alleviate the burden on hospitals and offer patients more choice regarding their living arrangements and care settings. Furthermore, the bill prohibits the requirement for placement in institutional facilities, thereby promoting home-based care options that are often preferred by patients and their families.

Summary

House Bill 1267, also known as Daniel's Law, is intended to enhance Medicaid home and community-based services waiver programs in Texas. The bill aims to provide essential medical services to individuals who are medically fragile and at least 21 years of age. Specifically, it mandates the development of a waiver under Section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act to allow flexibility in providing medical assistance outside the existing limitations of non-waiver services. This initiative seeks to ensure that vulnerable populations can receive the necessary care they require without being restricted by service duration or scope.

Contention

While the bill presents a comprehensive approach to enhancing service delivery for medically fragile individuals, it may also face scrutiny regarding its implementation and funding. Concerns may arise about the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of these new programs, especially given the fiscal constraints often encountered in Medicaid funding. Stakeholders may debate whether the proposed expansions are adequately funded and whether the state can sustain these additional services without straining the existing budget. Furthermore, advocacy groups may highlight the importance of ensuring that these programs are truly accessible to those most in need, raising potential issues regarding eligibility and bureaucratic hurdles.